"DAFKA can sue Indymedia and certainlky will if the other corrections we have demanded plus retractions to other mirror sites are not carried out. Lee Kaplan may also have a personal lawsuit against the publishers."


Becky shows that (only) a little knowledge of the law can indeed be dangerous - to making her look like a fool, as usual.

The same thing that applies to kaplan as a public person applies to your outfit as a public entity, plus one engaged in the kind of trash that you do. Plus, you obviously have plenty of opportunity and freedom to refute such claims here at sc-imc. Plus, Wallace and the Bay Guardian have already issued a correction, and so have met their ethical and any possible legal responsibility. (An ethnical responsibility which frontpageRAGazine never meets.) Finally, sc-imc carries a disclaimer: Kaplan/dafka would have a very high "burden" in court.

Finally, kaplan/dafka would have to show just _how_ their scurrilous reputations could possibly be damaged! - I mean, anymore than they have already done themselves. It'd be like the KKK complaining that someone was damaging its reputation and making it look bad!

So, demand away!

Woof, woof!

Or should I say arf arf!

(Still, what could come out in court as dafka goes down in flames would indeed be interesting.)