you are right. i do not want to discuss issues, i prefer to shit-talk. i somehow missed that part in your article referring to it being produced by a consensus of three dozen students. liza, you are correct too. i was not there. in fact, i was not in touch with anyone at all throughout the whole week, and i am basically talking out of my ass. and mr. damaged, you sir are certainly correct. tsu did in fact accomplish nothing! it makes perfect sense to me now that the antifascist caucus was so concerned about legitimizing an event that accomplished nothing. and now that i checked, i did notice that the rutgers antifascist caucus notified the organizers of tent state about this article, and about the existence of their group, and attempted to engage in productive dialog that involves rational thought out positions. i apologize for that oversight.
Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers
Date Edited: 26 Apr 2005 09:32:23 PM
you are right. i do not want to discuss issues, i prefer to shit-talk. i somehow missed that part in your article referring to it being produced by a consensus of three dozen students. liza, you are correct too. i was not there. in fact, i was not in touch with anyone at all throughout the whole week, and i am basically talking out of my ass. and mr. damaged, you sir are certainly correct. tsu did in fact accomplish nothing! it makes perfect sense to me now that the antifascist caucus was so concerned about legitimizing an event that accomplished nothing. and now that i checked, i did notice that the rutgers antifascist caucus notified the organizers of tent state about this article, and about the existence of their group, and attempted to engage in productive dialog that involves rational thought out positions. i apologize for that oversight.
New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz