Dear Mr. Rotkin,

You mention that the "No Party Ordinance" is a bad name because you claim the new ordinance won't be used against most parties. But that information is deceiving. Why?

You mention that one of the criteria that makes a party suspect is "drinking by minors". That quote describes the vast-majority of high school and UCSC students' parties. This is an anti-youth bill. Santa Cruz is netorious for it's lack of a night life, and now you'll have teens driving over to San Jose to get drunk. Shouldn't we worry more about drunk drivers on Highway 17 than a few underage kids stealin' some beers from the fridge?