Santa Cruz Indymedia :
Santa Cruz Indymedia

In the Other Press

To alleviate the problem of articles from other press sources being reposted on this IMC site, this section allows users to link to articles published elsewhere, and to contribute and read comments on those pieces. Have something interesting to post?


News :: Peace & War

Target Iran: It's a semi-secret joint US-Israel Operation

From Oct. 2003. The US has now secretly cooperated more than ever with the Sharon regime in Israel to prepare for an attack which if successful will destroy Iranian facilities that could be used to produce nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them. The justification model is of course Israel's attack on Osirak near Baghdad 22 years ago. Possibly to take place at the same time the Americans are preparing to attack North Korean nuclear facilities.

This is the real military pressure that is now being ratcheted up on both countries to quite literally attempt to force them to change course. This was the reason senior European Foreign Ministers recently rushed to Tehran.

But after watching what the US has now done to Iraq -- a country that in fact did succumb and change course only to find itself 'regime changed' and occupied by the Americans -- this historic cat and mouse game may not work quite so easily as it has before for Washington.

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

News :: Globalization & Capitalism : Peace & War

The Real Reasons Why Iran is the Next Target: The Emerging Euro-denominated International Oil Marker

The Iranians are about to commit an "offense" far greater than Saddam Hussein's conversion to the euro of Iraq’s oil exports in the fall of 2000. Numerous articles have revealed Pentagon planning for operations against Iran as early as 2005. While the publicly stated reasons will be over Iran's nuclear ambitions, there are unspoken macroeconomic drivers explaining the Real Reasons regarding the 2nd stage of petrodollar warfare - Iran's upcoming euro-based oil Bourse.


Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

News :: Gender & Sexuality : Government & Elections : Womyn

Remembering Rep. Shirley Chishom: Unbought and Unbossed

Shirley Chisholm, the first black woman to serve in Congress and the first woman to seek the Democratic presidential nomination, died on Saturday night at her home in Ormond Beach, Fla. She was 80. She had suffered several strokes recently, according to a former staff member, William Howard.

Mrs. Chisholm was an outspoken, steely educator-turned-politician who shattered racial and gender barriers as she became a national symbol of liberal politics in the 1960's and 1970's. She is also widely known for speaking out about the gender discrimination she faced throughout her life, stating that she experienced more discrimation as a woman than as a black person.

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

Commentary :: Education & Youth

Seattle Central Community College Students Force Army Recruiters off Campus

Among countless counter-inaugural actions held nationwide on January 20, 2005, the feistiest one took place in Seattle. Look at the photograph of Seattle Central Community College students forcing Army recruiters off campus. Naturally, no national media carried this news except Yahoo! News. What makes this action especially promising? The class and race of the students who organized it. According to Andrew Goldstein's profile of Seattle Central students, "everyone at Seattle Central lives off campus, and 80% hold full-time or part-time jobs."

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

Commentary :: Civil & Human Rights : Government & Elections : Womyn

Roe v. Wade: A Sensible Balance

Roe v. Wade: A Sensible Balance
Gloria Feldt
January 21, 2005

Planned Parenthood's Feldt celebrates the legacy of Roe v. Wade. This landmark legislation is under attack by the Bush administration, and the next four years will be critical. Feldt also cautions that the battle to protect women's reproductive freedom isn't only about the Supreme Court.

Gloria Feldt is president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

This January 22, we mark 32 years since Roe v. Wade guaranteed the legal right to abortion nationwide. With this decision, the U.S. Supreme Court established a woman's fundamental right to make her own childbearing decisions—free of governmental intrusion.

The rights Roe v. Wade granted are bedrock rights. We've come to recognize them as basic human rights, essential to women's equality. A majority of Americans are pro-choice. As we celebrate the anniversary of Roe , we also celebrate the fact that an entire generation of women has reached adulthood able to choose their own reproductive futures without risking jail, humiliation and death. We celebrate the freedom that has allowed women to fulfill increasingly diverse educational, social, political and professional dreams.

Yet over the past three decades, anti-choice extremists have succeeded in chipping away at the foundations of Roe , imposing restrictions that limit women's access to necessary reproductive health care. Rights without access are meaningless—which is precisely their point.

And now, in the U.S. Supreme Court, one vote is all that stands between our cherished reproductive rights and the end of Roe v. Wade as we know it.

A central tenet of Roe holds that a woman's life comes first; no restrictions to abortion may be imposed that endanger women's lives or health. But this crucial safeguard is currently supported by the slenderest of margins: one vote. It's all but inevitable that the composition of the court will change sometime in the coming four years; replacing even one justice may tip the balance. The future of Roe —and of our reproductive rights—lies on a razor's edge.

As Supreme Court appointments are for life, what happens in the next four years may determine the how we live our lives for the next 40 years.

If Roe crumbles, it's not only our right to legal abortion that's at stake. Along with Supreme Court decisions establishing the right to birth control, Roe helped define the contours of the constitutional right to privacy, protecting us from unwarranted governmental interference in our private affairs. A world without Roe may signal the beginning of an era of intolerable intrusion into all our other reproductive choices—such as the decision to use birth control—and into our personal lives.

Would any of us want to live in a world where something as personal as our right to decide whether or not to have a child is subject to governmental review?

A strong majority of Americans support Roe v. Wade. President George W. Bush has a responsibility to us, and to future generations, to nominate only those justices that will uphold the Constitution by affirming our basic human and civil right to make our own childbearing choices. But it's doubtful he will do so.

On the campaign trail in 2000, Bush pledged to appoint Supreme Court justices in the mold of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas—the justices most adamantly opposed to a woman's right to choose abortion—if he had a chance to fill a vacancy.

If his appointments to the federal courts are any indication, it is likely Bush will try to keep this promise in his second term. His nominees have included rabidly anti-choice judges like James Leon Holmes, Charles Pickering, and William Pryor—right-wing extremists whose views have demonstrated a lack of even the most basic compassion for women's lives.

Roe v. Wade is a compromise, a moderate and sensible balance that carefully considers the religious, ethical, scientific, medical, legal and social aspects of reproductive freedom. Just as the replacement of one Supreme Court justice could topple this balance, the appointment of a pro-choice justice could put our reproductive rights on firmer ground.

But it's time to weave a new and stronger cloth that will explicitly secure the right to make childbearing choices. We won reproductive freedom from the top down the first time. This time, we must work from the bottom up—taking the struggle to the local level, working to make sure state legislatures and governors block anti-choice laws from ever getting to the courts in the first place.

Most important, we must introduce and pass proactive legislation, such as the proposed federal Freedom of Choice Act, to codify our reproductive rights. Laws that will establish—simply but clearly—that no government can deny a woman's right to choose whether or not to use birth control, whether or not to become pregnant and whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.

This may be the hardest political battle we'll ever fight. But it will be, by far, the most important.

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

News :: Government & Elections

Mock Coffins and Anti-War Chants As Bush Sworn In

The word is gettting out in the MSM... or least on the European-owned newswire service and CSPAN. Read more about the inauguration parade that didn't go as smoothly as the Bush administration would want you to believe.

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

News :: Peace & War : Womyn

Woman stabbed on Pacific Avenue

Woman stabbed on Pacific Avenue

A 21-year-old homeless woman was stabbed by another woman on Pacific Avenue about 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, police say.

The victim was taken to Dominican Hospital suffering a small puncture wound to her lower stomach. It was not life-threatening, police said.

The victim’s girlfriend said the suspect started the fight after the victim asked her about a stolen hat. The fight began in front of Borders Books on Pacific.

Lt. Lee Sepulveda said officers hoped to arrest the suspect Tuesday evening. They believed she was on a bus to Scotts Valley, Sepulveda said.

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments

News :: Government & Elections

Rice Defends Shameless Lies on Iraq Intel

During today's confirmation hearings, Secretary of State designate Condoleezza Rice was sharply challenged by Sen. Barbara Boxer of California, who accused Rice and the administration of misleading the American people regarding the rationale for going to war.

Previous DOGSPOT coverage has documented the shameless lies that were used to justify the war in Iraq by leaders in the US and UK. British Foreign secretary Robin Cook was first in line to resign his post over the intentional misuse of intelligence for partisan politics.

"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on weapons of mass destruction
because it was the one issue everyone could agree on."

Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, as quoted by Robin Cook

Open article in new window...

View/Add Comments


No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event


Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software