LOCAL News :: Civil & Human Rights : Education & Youth : Police State
UCSC rep explains reasons for crackdown
Elizabeth Irwin, the PR representative for the UCSC administration spoke to a KION reporter in the wee hours of April 19th, following the arrest of 19 UCSC students at Tent University when they sat down together in a tent, linking arms and refused to leave after the 8PM “free speech� time had ended. Police also ripped down several tents which had been assembled for less than an hour.
“We care about the safety of our students very much.�
-- Liz Irwin, UCSC admin.
--Transcribed by Becky Johnson of HUFF
Elizabeth Irwin:
“A very tiny percentage of our 1500+ student body were involved. So I’d hate to think that this occasion actually characterizes our campus. In fact, It is the opposite.
We’re accustomed to challenging debate.
KION: The arrests? How was this decision made?
Elizabeth Irwin: This was a difficult situation made in consultation with faculty, leaders….actually after the Student Affairs staff had spent a lot of time warning students of alternatives and of consequences.
So The final decision was made by the senior administration and it was made with the understanding that there would be every precaution taken for safety. Another reason that things stopped for awhile was there seemed an intensive interest in accelerating on the part of the students….. We care about the safety of our students very much,
we did not want anything untoward to happen to them We thought it was better to just wait for awhile and see if the situation got less tense.
KION: So how was the decision made to pull back? When they had everyone surrounded?
Elizabeth Irwin: For the very reasons I mentioned.
The students became more expressive and seemed to be more interested in the kinds of behaviors that actually, we didn’t want to see continue. And so rather than engage in further confrontation it was better to just step back. Wait. Hope for the better as the evening wears on.
KION: this was supposed to be a weeks event-classes were going to be held by some professors down here. What is going to happen now the rest of the week?:
Elizabeth Irwin: Its too soon to know. We’ll have to see how things progress.
Our hope was this was to be a productive conversation a real opportunity
For students, faculty, and members of the community to come together in a productive way discuss issues that people care about. But it seems that There appears to be an interest in other kinds of approaches, ones that are not acceptable.
KION: The University supposedly made them some kind of offer they could go to a rock quarry? Why not let them put up tents and stay out here overnight?
Elizabeth Irwin: There are several reasons. First of all, this is not an area which we feel we could maintain for a safe environment. We are responsible for our students. We know that the campus at 8PM is closed accept for authorized access. We are concerned, frankly, about the possibility of unknown individuals coming to the campus, not necessarily with the best interests of our students at heart.
There was a wide advertisement for a “Y’all Come! Its gonna be a real occasion!
As I was down here earlier, even when there was productive discourse there were a number of members of the wider community whose agendas are unlikely to be those that are necessarily in sync with that of our own campus community.
Our hope was this was to be a productive conversation a real opportunity
for students, faculty, and members of the community to come together in a productive way discuss issues that people care about. But it seems that there appears to be an interest in other kinds of approaches, ones that are not acceptable.
So it was just a variety of concerns. This was not the place. There are other places.
If there is genuinely an interest for reasonable discourse and an opportunity to get together and share the experience, and make an improvement for what we hope has elements of interest for all of us, then why does it have to be here? Couldn’t it be somewhere else where everyone could have a more safe environment? That’s where we are today.
KION: What about tomorrow? could the same thing happen again?
Elizabeth Irwin: Its too soon to say.
We are interested in restoring the kinds of intellectual engagement that IS productive and that really can make a change. There are many examples of student activities that have accomplished
For example, there was a group of students who put together a Sustainable energy conference. Their consolidated efforts were able to change Regental policy
for ecological, and for sustainable green architecture.
Comments
Irwin was the source of false reports on drugs and alcohol
UC Police Chief, Mickey Aluffi confirmed that no alcohol or drugs were found, and no arrests for for drugs or alcohol were made.
There was no information about any noise complaints received AFTER the police and firetrucks arrived and students began screaming in pain from police pain compliance holds.
Re: UCSC rep explains reasons for crackdown
Re: UCSC rep explains reasons for crackdown
Re: free speech zones
i do not support the action taking by the administration and police, nor do i support the lies of the administration and the corporate media.
however, no rules or laws by the administration and police and no set of demands put forth by students, etc.... will replace the need for everyone to use common sense. sorry, but common sense can't really be explained, just think about it.
Re: UCSC rep explains reasons for crackdown
From the periphery :
The larger student body doesn't like their rights being sold wholesale, but only a tiny percentage of them have mustered the will to be fish-hooked and choked and hit with batons in order to oppose the fact that the very space required for "students, faculty, and members of the community to come together in a productive way discuss issues that people care about [Irwin]" does not exist, and if it did, the pundits would be there tearing shit up, empirically and rhetorically that is.
My first conversations with TU organizers about the event before it went down were comprised mostly of taking devil's-advocate opposition to it, hiding ambiguously behind the stance that activism is obsolete and social change can only occur through intellectual involvement, collective business, and applied technology -- marches are nice, but not enough. I left TU early monday night to do homework, and continued to talk with those on the outskirts, as i felt those were people that needed to be reached. This has all generated a hell of a lot of dialogue, everyone has had their say about it, for or against, especially the people who thought TU couldn't accomplish it's proposed goal, and generating discussion was the proposed goal. I didn't get a chance to see the monday night video till now -- watched it safe and cozy with a laptop in the library, with some tears, and felt like a pansy for criticizing you guys under the brim of intellectual sophistication, and all i have to offer is an email.
Your loving skeptic,
Todd Hindmarsh