Santa Cruz Indymedia : http://santacruz.indymedia.org
Home
Santa Cruz Indymedia

LOCAL News :: Education & Youth

Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

UPDATE FROM RUTGERS TENT STATE... As Tent State protests enter their fifth day, key organizers show how to achieve "mainstream" legitimacy: brown-nose the adminstration, defend fascist counter-protesters and be as politically ineffective as possible. Here's the inside story...
(This article was written by a participant of Tent State University at Rutgers and is posted here so that the brave students facing off against police violence in Santa Cruz know the real story. It was written with admiration of those TUSC students who were willing to stand by their principles even when facing the state's crackdown. If only their courage was emulated by others. Names have been changed. If you don't like what is written here, too bad, because it is what happened.)

When told by a white staff organizer of TSU Rutgers that he should not feel threantened by the presence of right-wing counter-protesters, 21 year old Eric responded, "I'm a queer person of color! How can I not feel threatened by them? They're being given a space to promote racist, homophobic and sexist views at Tent State. Matthew Shephard didn't have to be tied to a fence and beaten to death, but if we don't confront them, that is what happens. Yes, I feel threatened by them and you have no right to tell me that I'm not allowed to defend myself or to confront them."

Before Tent State University kicked off for the third time at Rutgers University, right-wing organizations planned to counter-protest, to disrupt and to heckle the event. They set up a canopy tent at the far end of the lawn where the camp is and proceeded to distribute anti-choice literature and berate passers-by.

Sometimes the attempts have been comical, like the sight of two Republicans with Support Our Troops signs facing off against six Iraq Vets Against the War. Others have been far more personal: two Republicans have already been banned from Tent State for harassing and threatening women, queers and people of color at the event. One member of the college Republicans was confronted by anti-fascists and forced to leave after distributing neo-nazi literature. The Rutgers Centurion, a right wing campus publication, held an affirmative action bake sale where the cost of baked goods was adjusted for the person's race. Others have attempted to infiltrate and disrupt events, one even setting off an M80 near the camp site and pulling a fire alarm in a nearby dorm.

Despite this, key organizers of TSU Rutgers have repeatedly and stubbornly blocked any moves by rank-and-file campers to put a stop to this continuing and coordinated harassment.

The reasoning they gave was that confronting the provacateurs played into their hands; they argued it would be seen in a bad light by the administration and media and would cause Tent State to be shut down. This same reasoning was given when a march to the ROTC buildings on campus was proposed, or when a building occupation was proposed, or counter-recruitment, etc. It seems that whenever any form of direct action is planned, TSU organizers swarm the individuals planning it and badger them until they drop the issue, accusing those considering direct action of "fractionalizing the progressive communtity."

Invariably, this has lead to the increasing alienation of anarchists, anti-fascists, radical feminists and anarchist people of color present. The fact remains that the decisions of how to approach contentious issues are in the hands of small, select group of organizers; there is no functioning democratic process. A general assembly meeting was held on Monday, April 18, but not since, and even that was sparsely attended due to timing. Outside of this process, the only alternative is autonomous action, yet whenever such an action occurs, staff organizers end up berating anyone dressed in black.

This is hardly the prevailing view of students camping out at Tent State. On the night of April 20, several anti-fascists decided to confront the counter-protesters and call them on their racist, homophobic bullshit. The anti-fascists had been masked up and when many campers saw this, they gave a thumbs up and donned masks themselves. Others were uneasy at first, but after the situation was explained that it was part of confronting the counter-protesters, they agreed. "We love our ninjas!" one called out.

However, when staff organizers realized that an autonomous action was occurring, they surrounded the anti-fascists and told the right wingers present: "Don't worry. We'll handle this." Several anti-fascists were accused of punching Republicans when the only physical contact had been when a neo-con shoved and threatened to punch one of the anti-fascists. One staff organizer even stated that these confrontations cannot happen, or "What happened in Santa Cruz will happen here."

It is this hypocritcal and spineless support of the proto-fascist Protest Warriors by Tent State staff organizers, not anti-fascist action, which has caused fractionalization. Upon hearing about the events, one Iraq Veteran Against the War shook his head and said, "They have to understand, you can't just throw incense and hugs at fascists."

Anarchists, anti-fascists, radical feminists and anarchist people of color have been systematically marginalized at Tent State Rutgers and an invisible hierarchy has asserted itself. When a staff organizer was asked whether the anti-fascists' concerns were valid, she replied, "No, they're not."

It may only be a symptom of something else. With its current methods and direction, the event has reached a peak where no matter how many more tents appear, it will never be more effective than it is now. When the only action allowed is camping out with tacit administration approval, holding teach-ins and phoning legislators, then it will never be effective.

While only in its first year, TUSC organizers have much they can and should teach other university campuses considering the Tent State idea. That includes the organizers of Tent State Rutgers.

As for 21-year old Eric, the experience has been a disheartening one.

"What did you expect?" his friend asked.

"Fucking fascist, racist, homophobic bullshit." Eric continued, shaking his head, "Fucking hippie bullshit."
 
 


New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz

Comments

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

right now tent state probably has the full support of around 50-60% of the student body and partial support of another 20-30%. What this essay proposes is to diminish that support to nothing - which is where the support for the fascist, racist and homophobic nonsense stands - i say we leave it there.
the right wing has little to no active support on campus - why should we give them a platform? the student body and the press will not see a confrontation as between anti-fascists and fascists but between the extreme right and extreme left and they will tune it out. already many students who support tent state refer to those who actively participate as 'they' - meaning that the larger student body does not feel a part of it - that is the central problem to deal with.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

Thanks for telling it like it is.
- a fellow Rutgers student

Who is this???
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

i will have to strongly disagree with this post. i am so sure that this was posted by rohit. great to see you hiding behind a group name instead of clearly identifying yourself as the poster. anyway whoever posted this, you are ridiculously exaggerating the situation. your logic is inconsistently applied and irrational. go build your own event and make it as successful as TSU has been, instead of giving TSU activists a hard time.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

Naming names is a past time for those who want to shit-talk, not discuss the actual issues. The individuals named above (btw, that's a really dick move to try and name someone without proof--no individuals were singled out in the piece) had nothing to do with writing this. Furthermore, this update was not the product of any single individual's experience, but a consensus of three dozen participants and Rutgers students who see themselves as anti-racist, anti-fascist and anti-homophobic. We are here. Name calling will not make us go away. Yes, we dissent to the way TSU at Rutgers has been organized. We will not abandon our legitimate concerns just to put a happy face on TSU Rutgers. There are problems of democratic process, marginalization of queer students, people of color and others who have strong anti-fascist, anti-authoritarian views. There is no self-selecting clique among us that calls the shots; do not assume it is only a few individuals who share these views.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

this is in response to ben's comment. how can you disagree with what happened, and make assumptions about who wrote the article, when you weren't even there? maybe you stopped by tent state at some point, but i never saw you, and i was there the entire week. if you're disagreeing with the entire article, then you're denying the existence of racism (and the acceptance of it), as well as the marginalization of groups of people who have already come out and said that they have been silenced, and that is extremely ignorant.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

"go build your own event and make it as successful as TSU has been, instead of giving TSU activists a hard time."

success? what? where? if by success you mean NOTHING, then yes. mission accomplished.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

dear rutgers antifascist caucus,

you are right. i do not want to discuss issues, i prefer to shit-talk. i somehow missed that part in your article referring to it being produced by a consensus of three dozen students. liza, you are correct too. i was not there. in fact, i was not in touch with anyone at all throughout the whole week, and i am basically talking out of my ass. and mr. damaged, you sir are certainly correct. tsu did in fact accomplish nothing! it makes perfect sense to me now that the antifascist caucus was so concerned about legitimizing an event that accomplished nothing. and now that i checked, i did notice that the rutgers antifascist caucus notified the organizers of tent state about this article, and about the existence of their group, and attempted to engage in productive dialog that involves rational thought out positions. i apologize for that oversight.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

ps. i'm a woman, dick.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

Ben makes an interesting point here:

"and now that i checked, i did notice that the rutgers antifascist caucus notified the organizers of tent state about this article, and about the existence of their group, and attempted to engage in productive dialog that involves rational thought out positions."

It was the absence of any meaningful dialogue on the part of certain Tent State staffers, when concerns were brought up, that lead to people feeling they had no option but autonomous action. Hell, one of them even challenged an antifa to a fight.

To suggest that a collective of individuals who felt marginalized and patronized by the actions and privileged attitudes of certain Tent State staffers, who came together to undertake an autonomous action, to suggest that they needed to inform and/or get permission from anyone else is rank arrogance. Ben, check yourself and your reformist privileged views at the door.

Autonomy, reality, solidarity.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

::deep sigh::

I live in fear.

Every single goddamn day, I live in fear.

No tent on a quad makes me feel less afraid.
No hippie bullshit makes me feel less afraid.
No people in orange shirts make me feel less afraid.

You know what makes me feel less afraid, Ben?

The Rutgers Antifa Caucus makes me feel less afraid.

And you stand against them. So now I know where we all stand.

Solidarity forever motherfucker.
 

Re: Feel-good complacency or direct action? The lessons of Tent State Rutgers

there is obviously no end to this debate. i respectfully apologize for "naming names", and for assuming damage was a mr. aren't you all glad though that you know who i am? so you know who you are directing your comments towards? for instance, eric from the article posted his comment under the name eric.

anyway, i certainly never suggested that a collective of individuals *needed* to inform TSU organizers or *get* permission from TSU organizers to post their opinions. i see this article as a discreet online jab at TSU organizers... note it was posted on a california indymedia site, was not sent to the new jersey TSU organizing listserv, and the opening statement "As Tent State protests enter their fifth day, key organizers show how to achieve 'mainstream' legitimacy: brown-nose the adminstration, defend fascist counter-protesters and be as politically ineffective as possible. Here's the inside story..." certainly does not convince me that the article is a legitimate presentation of the concerns of a collective of individuals.

eric, i do not stand against anti-fascists. i do not stand against you. i am sorry that tents and orange shirts scare you. i definitely did not indicate anywhere that in any way i stood against the "rutgers antifascist caucus". i stand against what i believe to be exaggerated charges against TSU organizers. i believe in solidarity as much as any anti-fascist caucus member. solidarity is simply "A union of interests, purposes, or sympathies among members of a group".
 

uh...

yo, so, like... yeah, i did not write the above article. just for the record.

and, also, it most definitely IS a legitimate representation of a LOT of individuals. at least 30 individuals, and counting.

point is, shit happened, people on all sides behaved badly, and the anarchists realized that the TSU staff had a crap crap crap pseudo-democratic process riddled with authoritarian bullshit.

i shall write on the internet of this no more. please email me (get my email from someone if you don't have it) or speak to me in person. or else, please stop dragging my name into things.

no more shit talk.

i'm'a go ride my bike now. see ya's.
 

The easily intimidated

For those of you who are afraid, I feel obliged to tell you as a conservative that we are not "out to get you." We also feel marginalized on campus, by the way, but we do not welcome hatemongers. Period.

However, you cannot run in fear just because someone presents a contrary opinion. Stand up for yourself! Eric's anger at the situation only points to one single thing: that he does not believe in freedom of speech or expression. Nowhere at Tent State did the conservatives advocate violence or hatred, but only a point of view contrary to yours.
Is that what you fear?
 

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Views

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software