To say there is some sort of egalitarian consistency, instead of arbitrary
sentencing by judges, regarding punishments for like crimes in American,
is laughable. Gary Ridgway, the Green River Murderer, a white male,
pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder in
Washington state recently, and got life in prison. John Allen Muhammad,
the “D.C.Sniper mastermind,� a black male, has pleaded guilty to one count
of murder in Virginia, and was sentenced to death. Now, that is a pretty
big difference in treatment for like crimes. Just what *do* the judges use
as criteria to come out with such a wide variation in sentencing for like
crimes in American courtrooms?
Sentencing Wars: The Green River Murderer Versus The D.C. Sniper
By Kirsten Anderberg (www.kirstenanderberg.com)
To say there is some sort of egalitarian consistency, instead of arbitrary
sentencing by judges, regarding punishments for like crimes in American,
is laughable. Gary Ridgway, the Green River Murderer, a white male,
pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder in
Washington state recently, and got life in prison. John Allen Muhammad,
the “D.C.Sniper mastermind,� a black male, has pleaded guilty to one count
of murder in Virginia, and was sentenced to death. Now, that is a pretty
big difference in treatment for like crimes. Just what *do* the judges use
as criteria to come out with such a wide variation in sentencing for like
crimes in American courtrooms?
I understand that different states may have different variations on laws,
but murder is murder. The sentencing, I would assume, would vary based on
maybe the gruesomeness of a crime, or the intent. But Ridgway’s crimes of
murder were more heinous than Muhammad’s, and were premeditated, and he
*still* got the lesser sentencing of the two. And his numbers of dead
greatly overshadowed the numbers Muhammad has pleaded guilty to, that is
for sure. So if the sentencing is not based on numbers at all, and it is
not based on the heinousness of the crime, and it is not based on
premeditation, what the hell *is* it based on? The state you commit the
crime in, and your skin color? I am really confused about this.
And it was not enough to get one death sentence on Muhammad. Just in case
the appeal in his first murder conviction is overturned and he gets life
in prison instead of death, they are prosecuting him a second time now, to
get a second death sentence on him so his death is confirmed. I am not
defending the horrific crimes these men committed, I am defending a
civilized legal system. I am defending the cherished concept of a fair
trial. Yes, even for the criminal. *Especially* for the criminal! A
civilized legal system does not just kill whoever the mobs hate or accuse
in the public square. That is really just the hanging-in-the-public-square
mentality we are supposedly trying to rise above. To have any credibility
at all, America cannot say it believes in egalitarian justice and punitive
consistency, and then provide court systems that are mockeries of logic
and equality.