In oral arguments the Supreme Court thus far appears to be unconvinced by the plaintiff. Earlier today, David Kravets of The Associated Press reported:
Commission opponents and the lower courts said it's the executive branch's duty to carry out legislation, but a majority of the justices did not appear to agree that the commission violates the so-called separation of powers doctrine. They must issue a ruling within 90 days.
Chief Justice Ronald George said the California Constitution, unlike the U.S. Constitution, gives the Legislature complete authority over appointments, and any appointment power of the governor is at the blessing of lawmakers.
Justice Joyce Kennard added, "This court has consistently upheld the existence of that power."
According to the Commission's executive director, Peter Douglas: "the stakes extend beyond California's borders, because a 1977 federal certification gave the Coastal Commission veto power over any attempt by the federal government to drill for oil off California's coast -- a power that would dissolve if the commission's structure changed."
"The federal decision would be final, and the state would lose its regulatory voice," Douglas said.Environmental groups have already posted action alerts: gas and oil interests have been trying to undermine the moratorium through a series of quiet maneuvers since August of 2001, and their efforts will intensify in the coming weeks.
David Roknich,
This site made manifest by dadaIMC software