I am fine that you have an opposing opinion to the war on Iraq, but does disagreeing with President Bush's judgement mean it necessary to attack him personally? Pictures critisizing him rather than the war itself, rather than what you are claiming to be against, are ridiculus to me. Making war on the President's character is not going to help stop war on Iraq. Anyone can have an opinion, but to have facts to support our opinion and persuade others to take on that opinion as their own - now that is much more difficult. Attacking President Bush is not going to persuade me to be against war. All it shows me is your inability to find HARD EVIDENCE that we should not go to war. Many people don't like President Bush, yet they support the war. So, once again, how is attacking President Bush going to convince them to be against the war? Give people facts to support your opinion, not more opinion that goes off on a tangent for goodness sakes. Either that, or get off the web because you have nothing important to give.
Comments
Why?