Santa Cruz Indymedia : http://santacruz.indymedia.org
Home
Santa Cruz Indymedia

LOCAL News :: [none]

Rules softened for street acts

...
Rules softened for street acts

<www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2002/December/12/local/stories/02local.htm>

December 12, 2002
By DAN WHITE
Sentinel staff writer

The City Council has eased space limits for downtown street buskers.
If the council had done nothing Tuesday night, donation-seeking
musicians and political tablers would have been forced at least on
paper to stay at least 14 feet from building entrances, street
corners, intersections, phones, fountains and benches, starting next
month.
But the council reduced the space limit to 10 feet. The council did
not roll back its space restrictions on panhandlers or sidewalk sitters,
who still must stay 14 feet from various Pacific Avenue spots.
The council called the change a compromise.
Councilman Scott Kennedy said the council and its Downtown
Commission already have spent too much time on the issue and have
far more important things to deal with, including millions in expected
budget cuts next year.
Miss Chief, who once went topless to protest new downtown
behavior rules, said 10 feet will still drive musicians away. She said
the city should let musicians follow self-imposed guidelines.
The decision came after more than four hours of discussion and
testimony from dozens of speakers, including marimba players saying
they felt like “outlaws.”
Donation-seeking musicians may also be subject to a rule requiring
them to move 100 feet after playing in front of the same store for an
hour. The council has yet to make a final decision on this rule.
Councilman Mike Rotkin said the must-move rule is not “Draconian”
because the council lifted the idea from guidelines used by the
musicians. The council’s version, however, uses much stronger
language than the voluntary version, which states a “one-hour
rotation is thought to be reasonable.”
The council left open the possibility of “exemption zones” for street
acts.
There is a long tradition of street performers here, including some
who are now world famous: Gillian Welch, Bob Brozman and Thoth
included.
While some street acts say they are harassed by merchants, some
merchants say they’ve been driven to grief by troublemakers. Carolyn
Heinrich, owner of the Pacific Trading Company, left the council
meeting in tears after saying she respects many street acts but that
some are “very disrespectful and uncooperative.”
“What is your definition of street musician?” she asked. “Someone
with a drum just banging in front of our door?”
The council passed stricter behavior rules for downtown in July,
calling them a response to pushy panhandlers and an intimidating
downtown atmosphere. Among the rules: a ban on Hackey Sack,
increased space setbacks for panhandling and an outright after-dark
ban on all panhandlers.
Street musicians protested loudly because the rules would also affect
them. The council gave them a seven-month reprieve while asking its
all-volunteer Downtown Commission to wade into the debate.
But on Tuesday the council did not go along with a commission
request that the city refrain from regulating downtown performers at
all for a trial period. The commission wanted to let musicians play for
change while working under voluntary guidelines.
Assistant City Manager Martin Bernal said that suggestion would
have hampered the ability for police and merchants to deal with
problems.
Councilwoman Cynthia Mathews called the commission plan
problematic “because there is nothing enforceable in the guidelines.”
She suggested the reduced space limit for musicians.
------------
Contact Dan White at dwhite (at) santa-cruz.com
 
 


New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz

Comments

Please research more, Dan

Dan, no offense, but your article has a glaring mistake.

>But on Tuesday the council did not go along with a >commission request that the city refrain from regulating >downtown performers at all for a trial period. The >commission wanted to let musicians play for change while >working under voluntary guidelines.

This is inaccurate, and in fact if that had been the recommendation of the commission, in all likelihood, voluntary guidelines would have been sanctioned. The commission would have been in consensus, there would have been no minority report, and there would have been no muddling city staff rebuttals.

In reality the downtown commission delivered a host of recommendations to the city council including rescinding the new ordinance, a city-resource draining demand for data collection about street performing by the police and city staff, monthly reports from the buskers, and language changes in the definition of display device and agressive solicitation.

The only thing the buskers really needed, was a continuation of the delay of the new ordinance and a chance to prove the effectiveness of the voluntary guidelines. Volunteers would have handled any complaints, and polled all stakeholder groups to prove the voluntary guidelines effectiveness. Under this approach, buskers (along with everyone else) would still have been regulated by the '94 ordinances; they would not, as you say, have been free from regulation.

I firmly believe it is because of the downtown commission's long list of additions, which divided the commission and caused city staff rebuttals, that the voluntary guideline approach was lost.

The one hour move-along is untenable, especially for political tablers because of the time it takes to set them up, and in fact the move-along was the primary concession made by buskers in exchange for a chance to prove the effectiveness of the voluntary guidelines. Writing that concession into law is not only a dirty deal on buskers, but makes absolutely no sense to apply it political tablers. I realize there are a zillion things that our council has on their plate, but it still doesn't excuse blockhead laws.
 

Culture

Street preformers give some culture to an otherwise modern material culture. We need street preformers so that we can take a break and lisson to true talent unlike the over produced, packaged, box it up desposible pop crap that drownds out the radio. Street preformers just put some culture and life back into a mostly concrete despsible world.
 

Long-Standing Enforcement Mechanisms Better than (New and Old) Downtown Ordinances

Actually the Downtown Ordinances of 1994 destroy the Voluntary Guidelines (by banning playing in front of buildings and in front of street cafes). The Guidelines have continued because (after massive street protests against the Sitting Ban in 1994) police chose to use other enforcement mechanisms.

Bobby is correct in noting that Dan White (and City Council) ignored those enforcement mechanisms, which include laws against excessive noise, disturbing the peace, trespass, and (hard to believe but actually used) "terrorist threats" (used against Skidmark Bob Duran for his song "Shoplifting at the Bookshop Santa Cruz).

The point some of us made in 1994 and in 2002 is that enforcement mechanisms already exist. The police are just looking for broader powers, as ever. And it's not a wise thing to give it to them, nor does it address any real problems the merchants and street performers may occasionally have with each other.
 

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Views

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software