Santa Cruz Indymedia :
Santa Cruz Indymedia

Announcement :: Alternative Media

Reclaiming The Media

The next big day in the fight for media reform will be June 19, when the McCain-chaired Senate Commerce Committee will decide whether to support a motion to rescind the FCC rule changes.

Robert McChesney is a professor at the University of Illinois. This was originally posted on and to a number of local email lists. I have posted it here for those who may not otherwise have seen that they can take this very important action to reclaim the media.
It should come as no surprise that the decision of the Federal Communications Commission to rewrite media ownership rules has stirred a firecry in Congress. Unlike the members of the FCC, members of the House and Senate must face the voters at election time. And, while Americans may disagree about many issues, they are united on one point: Communications conglomerates should not be allowed to extend their already excessive control of the public discourse at the local or national level.

The FCC knew this because more than 750,000 Americans told them so. According to dissident Commissioner Michael Copps, who opposed rewriting the rules to favor the interests of big media corporations, citizen input to the FCC ran 99.9 percent against the proposed rule changes. And this was after FCC Chairman Michael Powell explicitly asked Americans to email and write the FCC to tell him what they thought about relaxing the media ownership rules. Yet, FCC Powell and his two Republican allies went ahead and did the bidding of the media giants -- after accepting dozens of junkets paid for by the key players in industries they are supposed to regulate.

Now, members of Congress are working on a number of fronts to reverse the damage done June 2 when the FCC voted to allow a single company to buy up television stations that reach up to 45 percent of American viewers, to own two (or, in some cases, even three) television stations in the same town, and to own both newspapers, radio and television stations in the same community.

Senators who opposed the ownership rule changes -- ranging from progressives like Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold to moderates like Wisconsin Democrat Herb Kohl and Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and conservatives like Mississippi Republican Trent Lott -- are talking about forcing a vote to overturn the new rules, restricting appropriations that the FCC needs to implement the rules or simply writing laws that would supercede the rules. And they are winning new allies daily. Even Arizona Republican John McCain, who is usually a champion of loosening restrictions on media ownership, says, "I have gone from (being) a deregulator to someone who is very concerned about the level of media concentration."

The next big day in the fight for media reform will be June 19, when the McCain-chaired Senate Commerce Committee will decide whether to support a motion to rescind the FCC rule changes.

The Congressional interest -- and potential intervention -- is great news. But Americans should not be lulled into complacency by a sense that Congress will simply do the right thing when it comes to defending competition, diversity and local control of media. Only by keeping up the pressure on Congress will citizens force their representatives to block these rule changes and to begin the process of restoring the public-interest rules and regulations that will protect the public interest that the FCC chose to ignore.

To learn all about the fight to rescind the rule changes, and to get a comprehensive overview of the burgeoning media reform movement, go to

You will also learn about the National Conference on Media Reform in Madison in from November 7-9.

But don't stop there. Take two minutes to make the difference between victory and defeat.

Go to the online petition and tell your friends to do the same. Read on for more details.

This "viral" petition campaign will create a massive wave of petitions to Commerce committee members in both chambers.

The legislation (S.1046) would roll back the broadcast ownership cap limit, and a crucial amendment is planned that would reverse the rule allowing cross-ownership of newspapers and TV stations.

Here's what to do:

1) Go to the petition campaign

2) Personalize the message to your Congressional delegation

3) Enter email addresses of friends and colleagues in your state;

4) Send your message. It will be printed out and walked to your members of Congress, and this message will be forwarded to your contacts. Your friends will not receive spam as a result of this petition.

It's that simple.

For more information on the FCC battle, media reform and how to get involved, go to

You should also go to the Common Cause website, Common Cause has been a champion in this struggle.

Don't have world wide web access? Forward this email to your friends and colleagues in your state.

June 19 is just the first step in this next part of the fight to take the power back from big media.

New Comments are disabled, please visit


Indymedia Successes and Failures Internationally

In truth is both audacious and distinguished. It is a baby and it could be called an immaculate conception: its father was media's studied lack of concern with issuse that could have been seen as troublesome to the global corpocracy, and its troubled mother was the WTO riots of Seattle at the opening of the new century.
The Indymedia International Network of Websites.

Re: Reclaiming The Media

Why can't the FCC simply let a thousand flowers like Freak Radio Santa Cruz bloom across the country? Why must a government entity control who is allowed to broadcast, any more than they can control who can print a magazine or newspaper? Why doesn't the First Amendment apply fully to broadcasters? Who would care about corporate control of the existing radio and TV stations if others could spring up spontaneously to counter the establishment propaganda and truly serve community needs?

In worrying about media ownership concentration, and pleading with our rulers for fairer rules, aren't we just buying into the lie that government has any proper business keeping people OFF the air? Aren't we asking the wrong questions and going down the wrong roads? When will we ask the right questions and take the high road of refusing to allow the FCC the authority to grant frequency monopolies to broadcasters, whether corporate or individual? Why can't we treat spectrum space like land? Why can't you stake a claim and "homestead" if nobody is using the frequency and you interfere with nobody else in your own use of it? Why can't we say, "do what you want with the spectrum space, but if you don't use it you lose it and somebody else can move in?"

Why can't we see that, in the modern day, there is enough spectrum space for everyone who wants to make use of it? That there are enough broadcast channels to let everyone get on the air who has a need or desire to do so? Why can't we just let it happen without the traffic cop turned tyrant: the FCC?

Why haven't you written your elected officials in Washington about this yet?


No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event


Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software