The FCC announced Friday that is has rescheduled the Localism Hearing with the stated purpose to "gather information from consumers, industry, civic organizations, and others on broadcasters' service to their local communities" (from the press release, available on the www.fcc.gov website).
The hearings, scheduled originally for March 17th, were cancelled without comment. They have been rescheduled for July 21st. SAVE THE DATE!
January's San Antonio hearings got this coverage on Austin's IMC:
"Hundreds of people attended the FCC hearing here in San Antonio yesterday. Media activists and citizens dissatisfied with corporate control of the airwaves outnumbered industry representatives easily. During the meeting, the crowd often booed and voiced their displeasure with the commisioners and panelists, as well as cheering speakers who decried the abuses of the corporate powers that be. Two incidents stand out in particular. The representative for the NAACP, who stated that he supported deregulation and did not feel that "bigger is necessarily bad", supported his position by saying that if the people were dissatisfied with the media, they should "just buy their own station." This remark was met with jeers and yells. The representative of Univision was asked by a member of the audience why his station supported such a narrow representation of women. His response was that he felt that the women on his station were "beautiful" and he "had no complaint about them". He displayed no comprehension of the actual question asked him."
In San Antonio one man was thrown out for yelling "THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE!" after Powell announced that public comment would continue for just one more hour (there were hundreds still in line).
christyne from austin.indymedia.org writes:
"Last year marked an explosion in public awareness of media's vital role in our democracy. With your help we scored some important victories - including winning a resounding, bipartisan 55-40 vote in the Senate for a "resolution of disapproval" of all the FCC's disastrous new ownership rules. We also succeeded in gathering more than 200 signatures from both parties in the U.S. House to support the measure. Our victory in the media ownership fight was only stymied by the efforts of House leadership and closed-door negotiations with the White House.
Outside Washington, this past November an astounding 1,700 media activists, advocates, musicians, students, scholars, and media workers from around the country and the world attended the National Conference on Media Reform in Madison, Wisconsin. It was a terrific opportunity to learn, make connections, and plan the next steps of the media ownership fight -- and of the broader battle to establish a truly democratic media system."
SO IT'S TIME TO BUILD ON THESE AND OTHER MEDIA VICTORIES! Those of you involved with college radio, microradio, pirate radio, grassroots radio, attend this weekend's Grassroots Radio conference near Santa Barbara (http://grc.kcsb.org) and get FIRED UP to attend the FCC hearings, where Media activists from Seattle to "San Diego" (North Tijuana) will converge, testify, jeer, resist, and make our voices heard.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
For original FCC press release announcing task force/localism hearings, 10/03:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239578A2.pdf
Oh and the picture is Michael Powell, chair of the FCC and son of Colon, sporting his FREE RADIO SANTA CRUZ Tshirt.
Speaking of FRSC, be aware that as FRSC is unlicensed, has recently been visited by the FCC, and will likely if not certainly be the ONLY media group to be reporting on this hearing and discussing issues like media ownership, content, licensing, and censorship, PLEASE listen to Free Radio 101.1, check the website (www.freakradio.org), and be vigilant as the FCC may attempt to silence the only radio station that dares stray from the ClearChannel led-pack. WE MUST NOT LET THIS HAPPEN. FRSC will broadcast throughout the hearings which are designed to allow criticism of FCC procedures.
They will not silence their critics, and we will not be licensed!
Comments
Re: FCC Coming to Monterey on July 21; Santa Cruz Organizing Meeting TOMORROW
Note: CDD was one of the petitioners in the case, along with Consumers Union and the Consumer Federation of America. It was represented by Media Access Project.
Today, the Court delivered a judgment that almost everyone but FCC Chair Michael Powell and his two GOP colleagues knew was coming: That the FCC decision on media ownership on June 2, 2003, was fatally flawed. Under Powell, the FCC embarked on a "rush to judgment" that promoted dangerous deregulation of the nation's media ownership rules. The GOP majority was so convinced by its ideological perspectives that it failed to conduct public hearings (except one) and to engage in serious independent scholarship and analysis. To be honest, there is a striking and disturbing parallel between the Powell's FCC fixation that the nation's newspaper, broadcast, and network television was so diverse that ownership safeguards could be jettisoned, and the Administration's Iraq policy that also appears to have been shaped by preconception--not facts.
The review ordered today by the Court provides the country with a new opportunity to debate and review more seriously the policies that determine how the First Amendment should best serve the public and the press. This time, millions of Americans will be closely watching how the country's media lobbyists, including the four TV networks, and the Commissioners create an agenda that addresses this issue in a way our democracy deserves.
_www.democraticmedia.org
202-494-7100
202-986-2220
www.democraticmedia.org/news/3rdCircuitDecision.html
Audio File: FCC Commissioners Speak at Media Town Hall
This Evening, June 24, 2004, a Town Hall was held at the Portland Convention Center entitled "The Portland Town Hall On the Future of the Media. This event began at 5:30, and as I write this at 10:30, the public testimony is still being aired on Community Television, channel 30.
An ambitious project, presented by Free Press, in partnership with the City Club of Portland; the Communication Workers of America, Local 7901; Jobs WIth Justice; the Money in Politics Research Project; the Mount Hood Cable Regulatory Commission; and the American Federation of Musicians, Local 99
This first part of the event was moderated by Jo Ann Bowman, who introduced two FCC Commissioners, Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein. This is a 20 minute file of the remarks by the two Commissioners. Many other people spoke, and later I'll hopefully be able to post more of what others had to say about the dangers faced by our Democracy due to media consolidation.
FCC Commissioners Copps and Adelstein
Earlier in the week I posted remarks made by several people at the Media Conference, held last Sarturday afternoon at Portland State University. These audio files can be found at PhilosopherSeed Special Features Page
homepage: www.PhilosopherSeed.org
Summary of media organizations in Santa Cruz
Total Radio Stations: 56
Total Television Stations: 15
Total Cable Franchises: 9
Total Print Organizations: 1
Find out who controls the media where you live.
Re: FCC Coming to Monterey on July 21
Why do we uphold the power of the FCC to, for example, give Free Radio Santa Cruz's channel over to the REPEATER of a pseudo-religious broadcaster, forcing FRSC to find another uninhabited area of the spectrum in which to squat? Why can't MORE stations created by the people themselves spring up as FRSC did, and why can't the government respect their right to exist as long as they interfere with no pre-existing station or signal?
Why do so many people seem so eager to trade one set of rules for government oversight of broadcasting for another set? Shouldn't there be an examination of whether government oversight itself isn't the problem, or at least a key contributor to it?
Why is it that the controversy over media ownership looks more like factions fighting over the levers of power and who gets to pull them to reward friends and punish enemies, rather than any kind of push to advance the interests of "fairness" or "the people"?
Who will speak the truth of these questions to power?