I'm disappointed about all of this on many levels. What bullshit.

It seems strange to me that RCNV, which works to promote safe-zones (however you'd like to define them) in the community and abroad, would deprive "unconventional" people of a safe place to continue the establishing of just that-- a safe, non-judgmental place to be.

That a meeting wasn't held, that a warning wasn't given, that someone didn't sit down with the infoshop tenants prior to eviction speaks VOLUMES about the individual here that is representing RCNV. Why didn't this happen? Did he really think that these people who poured their hearts into this place wouldn't comply?

Big props to the infoshop collective for all of their energy. Not in vain. Chins up.