I want to "get real" and actually hear someone support their claims that infoshop collective members have been blaming others for their failures (whatever you may conider those to be). Posting those responses from infoshop.org doesn't say anything about the infoshop or the eviction. In fact, it makes you look stupid if you have to rely on what random people posted on the internet in order to villify the people keeping the infoshop running. Maybe some of the infoshop staffers offend your delicate nose. This could be a problem. But as the issue has been raised, it could very well be people who have visited the space who are being told they smell bad. Should people be turned away because of their smell? This would perhaps be something "real" anarchists would do--not these "lifestyle" anarchists and "so-called" anarchists who worked their asses off to open the infoshop. "get real": if you want to tell me why the people running the infoshop are not real anarchists (which you obviously imply), I am all ears. Perhaps a string of people will post varied accusations against the infoshop collective without ever responding to what "infoshop-person" or I have posted. Someone who doesn't know what is going on or the people involved probably has little to say about some of the particulars being discussed here. So, those who villify the infoshop collective (obviously knowing them somewhat or at least having heard rumours...) should try to respond thoughtfully and intelligently instead of complaining about vague categories like "lifestyle anarchists."