So meat eaters are to be banned too? "corpse eathers" are responsible? I take offense, I am a carnivore and I hate oppression and fascism. While it is my personal believe that NO One should be allowed to buy a meat that they had not personally killed (once is enough to make future purchases). AND YES, THERE WOULD BE ONE HELL OF LOT LESS MEAT BEING EATEN if that were to happen. But, I like meat occasionally. Hundreds of thousands of years have prepared my system for meat, along with nuts, berries, etc. AND YES, THERE WOULD BE ONE HELL OF LOT LESS MEAT BEING EATEN. And being a corpse eater, as humanely as possible, within the food chain that has allowed mankind and all previous animalas to survive to this point, I TAKE OFFENSE TO BEING CALLED PART OF THIS PRESENT US TYRANNY OF TODAY.
Carniveganores for Equality and Constitutional Rights (CECR). Requires one, as quick and as painless a death as possible, (without the need of vet approval) for the dinner that will be partaken. Look for a few more to not partake of dinner. JMO. After that, it's a Carnivores Constitutional Right to eat meat. Is everyone to be thrust in veganism and carnivores called fascist because we eat meat, while those under any label (fascism itself if this happens) vilify us not for our actions but what we eat?
Is any American not allowed to eat what she wants to eat? Will they be made criminals next?
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Re: An Injury to One is an Injury to All
Date Edited: 25 Nov 2004 11:47:12 AM
So meat eaters are to be banned too? "corpse eathers" are responsible? I take offense, I am a carnivore and I hate oppression and fascism. While it is my personal believe that NO One should be allowed to buy a meat that they had not personally killed (once is enough to make future purchases). AND YES, THERE WOULD BE ONE HELL OF LOT LESS MEAT BEING EATEN if that were to happen. But, I like meat occasionally. Hundreds of thousands of years have prepared my system for meat, along with nuts, berries, etc. AND YES, THERE WOULD BE ONE HELL OF LOT LESS MEAT BEING EATEN. And being a corpse eater, as humanely as possible, within the food chain that has allowed mankind and all previous animalas to survive to this point, I TAKE OFFENSE TO BEING CALLED PART OF THIS PRESENT US TYRANNY OF TODAY.
Carniveganores for Equality and Constitutional Rights (CECR). Requires one, as quick and as painless a death as possible, (without the need of vet approval) for the dinner that will be partaken. Look for a few more to not partake of dinner. JMO. After that, it's a Carnivores Constitutional Right to eat meat. Is everyone to be thrust in veganism and carnivores called fascist because we eat meat, while those under any label (fascism itself if this happens) vilify us not for our actions but what we eat?
Is any American not allowed to eat what she wants to eat? Will they be made criminals next?
Ed Ward, MD,
Founder, LA-CRC, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LA-CRC/
Founder, LSMP, groups.yahoo.com/group/LSMP/
edward19(at)cox.net (at) = @ (for the @ crawlers) my email.
thepriceofliberty.org/ward.htm
www.quickbase.com/db/99r7qj9f (Class action lawsuit state info)
groups.yahoo.com/group/louisianacivilrightscouncil/ (LA state info)
groups.yahoo.com/group/LA-CRC/ [Louisiana Civil Rights Council Message Board]
Learn about your Family and Individual Constitutional Rights and this governments Constitutional Restrictions and Vote.
www.google.com/search
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz