CO says, "I think I should reiterate my point in light of this more accurate information that the defacer essentially just caused damage to a period building, one not directly connected (in the non-physical sense) to the work of the missionaries."
This is incorrect, the building WAS part of the Mission's barracks, it was only later that it was used for other things.
Re: Columbus Day vandalism
Date Edited: 17 Oct 2005 10:36:16 AM
This is incorrect, the building WAS part of the Mission's barracks, it was only later that it was used for other things.
New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz