Santa Cruz Indymedia :
Santa Cruz Indymedia

there are resolutions and there are resolutions...

A resolution that simply says "Patriot bad" is, in my opinion, a waste of council and taxpayer time, and can even be seen as a fraud, in the sense that there may be a large number of city residents who disagree with the resolution, but who cannot attend the council meetings or effectively lobby their council members. When you say that umpty-ump hundred cities have passed resolutions against the Act, this naturally encourages the listener to imagine vast numbers of urban dwellers in opposition to Patriot, when the truth -- and the opposition -- may in fact be only half-vast.

On the other hand, a resolution that says "Patriot bad and here is how your city government will NOT comply..." is proper city business, because it has a direct bearing on how city operations will be conducted.

Which kind of resolution is Watsonville's?

I think a city council, if it wishes to register a view on the Patriot Act, the War, or any other regional or national concern in the name of the City, should hold a special election, encourage all to vote their consciences, and then publish the results. Anything else cannot credibly pretend to be "the city's" opinion. But a council resolution that directs specific city government behavior in response to a particular situation is certainly legitimate.

New Comments are disabled, please visit


No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event


Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software