Let's demand that Farr go to Iraq and strap himself to a weapons bunker as a human shield. Anything less than that is a failure to achieve the goals that we demand of everyone around us, no matter what else they are doing.

Hmm... sliperly slope from your arguments to the one above. If Farr DID act as a human shield, you would "protest" which target he chose. There is no making you happy, is there?

The article you quote here states that he is one of the lone people in Congress still opposing this war. THis is what you wanted, right? Have you read the SJ Mercury News front page article stating HOW MANY REPRESENTATIVES HAVE RUN FOR THE PATRIOTIC HILLS? No. Even though he is in solidarity with your golden idols Barbara Lee and Dennis Kucinich, you think that this is somehow not good enough unless he... becomes a human shield, perhaps? By the way, Mr. Kucinich ALSO voted "present" for the soldiers' support resolution vote. Are you going to rally against him now?

Speaking of which, if you were really opposed to the war, you all might want to go to Iraq and be human shields yourself (put your money where your mouth is). Or are you just armchair activists?

By the way, I tried to leave a last comment in the previous comment chain, but it was never posted (tried twice). It's not worth my time to appease you, which is why I haven't bothered since.