Hmmm...

It sounds as though the RCNV's decision is final and the focus is now on finding a new space for the InfoShop.

Just the same, I am curious about the mysterious two-page list of alleged complaints.

Does the RCNV have some sort of open meeting policy, whereby members of the public can watch these decisions being made, and offer comments? Is there some sort of open disclosure policy, whereby members of the public can access RCNV documents?

It seems that the RCNV, in the course of its anti-war work, expects these things of our government.

Shouldn't we expect these things of the RCNV? It is, after all, a non-profit agency, which means that we subsidize it (by not charging local, state, or federal taxes) in return for an ostensible social benefit.

I challenge the RCNV to post the list of alleged complaints right here on IndyMedia, so that the matter can be discussed openly.

I suppose this is one of the risks of dealing with non-profits. If InfoShop were leasing space from a public entity like the library, the Brown Act would guaranty us the right to see the documents and participate in the deliberations.