Santa Cruz Indymedia : http://santacruz.indymedia.org
Home
Santa Cruz Indymedia

LOCAL Announcement :: Globalization & Capitalism : Resistance & Tactics

Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

On May 7th the UCSC Anarchist Research Cluster and the Center for Cultural Studies will host a one-day conference and conversation exploring and contextualizing contemporary anarchism.

Organizing questions include: How can we think adequately about anarchism’s place in current social justice movements? What resources does anarchism present us for addressing the current moment? What is it about this current conjuncture that resonates with anarchism? How might anarchism be a part of re-politicizing the academic left?

The conference will include two panels with ample time for discussion, and an extended lunch discussion. Conference speakers include Iain Boal, Arif Dirlik, Carwil James, John Holloway, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, Barry Pateman, Roger White, and Eddie Yuen.

The open form of the conference will facilitate a roundtable atmosphere for all to participate actively.

========================
ANARCHISM NOW
May 7, 2005
University of California, Santa Cruz
Oakes 105
Time: 9:30-6:00

As we enter the 21st century, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. Since the end of the Cold War and the beginning of the open-ended War on Terror, the dominant ideologies, categories, antagonists, analyses of power and the modes in which it is exercised have changed. Accordingly, the theories and praxes of resistance are changing as well.

Among these, anarchism has re-emerged in the last several years as a prominent element within radical social movements in North America and Europe, particularly among those which aspire to act in solidarity with movements in Asia, Africa and Latin America on the offensive against neoliberalism and U.S. imperialism. Many of these draw upon compatible traditions of local autonomy, direct democracy, and resistance to market economies and colonizing institutions. Meanwhile in the global north, the organizing practices and techniques of resistance associated with anarchism have spread widely among activists working for social and economic justice, including those who do not espouse an anarchist ideology.

On May 7th the University of California, Santa Cruz Anarchist Research Cluster and the Center for Cultural Studies will host a one-day conference and conversation exploring and contextualizing contemporary anarchism. Organizing questions include: How can we think adequately about anarchism’s place in current social justice movements? What resources does anarchism present us for addressing the current moment? What is it about this current conjuncture that resonates with anarchism? How might anarchism be a part of re-politicizing the academic left?

The conference will include two panels with ample time for discussion, and an extended lunch discussion. Conference speakers include Iain Boal, Arif Dirlik, Carwil James, John Holloway, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, Barry Pateman, Roger White, and Eddie Yuen. The open form of the conference will facilitate a roundtable atmosphere for all to participate actively.


Conference Schedule:

9:30-10:00 Coffee and Introductions

10-12:30 First Panel: “Lessons from History,� “Praxis�
Iain Boal, "Brief Notes on Science, Knowledge and Anarchism."
Arif Dirlik, "Anarchism in China or Chinese Anarchism: The Importance of Local Articulations in Anarchist Practice�
Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, "Why Lucy Parsons is Relevant Today."
Barry Pateman, TBA

12:30-2:00 Lunch Discussions

2:15-4:45 Second Panel “Gods of Market, Gods of State,� “Means and Ends�
John Holloway, “Changing the World without Taking Power�
Carwil James, on Subjectivities of Resistance
Roger White, TBA
Eddie Yuen, "The Uses of Chaos: Disaster, Accumulation, and Popular Anarchism".

4:45-5:00 Break

5:00-6:00 Closing Remarks



Contact: Anarchism2005 (at) graffiti.net
 
 


New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz

Comments

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

SPEAKERS

Iain Boal, a social historian of science and technics, teaches geography at UC Berkeley. He has spoken extensively on the concepts of enclosure,
privatization and the commons, and is the author of The Long Theft (forthcoming, City Lights) and co-editor of Resisting the Virtual Life (City Lights, 1995). He is also active in the Institute for the Study of Social Change, contributing to research on social justice movements in the Bay Area.

Arif Dirlik is Professor of History and Anthropology and Knight Professor of Social Sciences at the University of Oregon. His books
include Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution (California, 1991); Schools into Fields and Factories: Anarchists, the Guomindang, and the National Labor University in Shanghai, 1927-1932 (Duke, 1991); and After the Revolution: Waking to Global Capitalism (University Press of New England, 1994).

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz was a founder of the feminist movement and anti-war activist and organizer, forming associations with revolutionaries across the spectrum of radical and underground politics during the 1960s and 1970s. She is Professor of Ethnic and Women's Studies at California State University, Hayward. She is the author of The Great Sioux Nation (Moon, 1977), Indians of the
Americas (Zed, 1984), and the memoirs Red Dirt (Verso, 1997) and Outlaw Woman (City Lights, 2001).

John Holloway is one of the best-known analysts of the Zapatista rebellion, and the author of Change the World Without Taking Power (Pluto Press, 2002). He has lived in Mexico for over a decade and teaches political science at the Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanides in the Universidad Autonoma de Puebla.

Barry Pateman is Associate Editor of the Emma Goldman Papers, and has been the project's research associate in the U.K. since 1989. A
historian, he also teaches free classes on anarchism at the Anarchist Library at City College in San Francisco.

Eddie Yuen is the co-editor of The Battle of Seattle: The New Challenge to Capitalist Globalization (Soft Skull, 2001) and Confronting Capitalism (Publishers Group West, 2004). He is on the faculty of the activism and social change program at New College of California in San Francisco.
 

Anarchism Now Conference graphic

a quick graphic
Click on image for a larger version

anarchism_now_2web.jpg
Anarchism NOW
.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Looks like a good event.

Question - Are there gonna be any organic intellectuals speaking - as opposed to academics?
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

From what I can tell, there is a stronger emphasis on traditional academic theorists (PhD.s) than upon "organic" folks.

This is a concern among some folks, and I know that some efforts have been made to try to get more "activist" folks presenting, rather than just academic folks. I know there will be some mix, but one way for us to help alleviate that imbalance is for us non-traditional/non-academic intellectuals to attend and participate. Time and space has been made for everyone to be involved in the dialogues.

Also, don't miss out on the Anarchist Cafe happening that evening, from 6pm-midnight. (?) The details are floating around here somewhere... listen to Free Radio for further info.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

hmmm...never good to just have the academics. where's labor? where's direct action? where's the community? just a thought with all the best wishes, though. the real stuff happens when people talk to each other, anyway, not from listening to anyone talk to themselves through a mic.

autonomy, reality, solidarity.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Why not have none-left anarchists too? What I am talking about, that would not meet PC rules now would it.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

why not be real with yourselves and call the event Intellectual Masturbation 2005: Vanguard of Rebellion. too bad there aren't any anarchists speaking, instead activist-specialists. academic-philosophers. i'm sure they'll eat the vegan food at Saturn Cafe while they're in Santa Cruz. I'm sure they'll support local business and shop at Food Bin, or better yet... New Leaf. The speakers will probably engage in philosophical babble all day. then they go home. nice weekend. talk about it for weeks to come. sad.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

As an organizer, I'm really looking forward to hearing what thoughtful academics have to say. Why so grumpy?
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

I ain't hatin on the event, but I do think that having some non-left anarchist types at some of these SC things would be nice for a change.
 

Theory is a necessary element of Praxis

"Why so grumpy?"

Because he joined the force for macho excitement, but instead they have him sitting in front of a computer screen all day long, making up stupid comments to harrass the leftists. You might get grumpy, too, if your life was so utterly pathetic.
 

Chomsky on "right" anarchists

Q: Many "anarcho-capitalists" claim that anarchism means the freedom to do what you want with your property and engage in free contract with others. Is capitalism in any way compatible with anarchism as you see it?

Chomsky:
Anarcho-capitalism, in my opinion, is a doctrinal system which, if ever implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few counterparts in human history. There isn't the slightest possibility that its (in my view, horrendous) ideas would be implemented, because they would quickly destroy any society that made this colossal error. The idea of "free contract" between the potentate and his starving subject is a sick joke, perhaps worth some moments in an academic seminar exploring the consequences of (in my view, absurd) ideas, but nowhere else.
 

Chomsky is so full of it...

CHOMSKY: The idea of "free contract ...[trashes]

How about a contract where X agrees not to pie Noam in the face if Y agrees not to pie Horowitz in the face and Z agrees not to spit in Jane Fonda's face if Z' agrees not to pie Ann Coulter in the face and that way nobody gets a bloody nose????

But no...
Thanks in no small measure to ...
santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17586/index.php
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Q: Many "anarcho-capitalists" claim that anarchism means the freedom to do what you want with your property and engage in free contract with others. Is capitalism in any way compatible with anarchism as you see it?


This sounds like the policy of Google Ad-words and some (so far a minority) of the other internet affiliate programs out there --- be carefull to read the fine print of the membership agreements to find out just how far your freedom of speech extends if you want to try to make money with any of these programs by hosting them on your website. If the bad affiliate programs end up taking over, the sites that host banner ads or that advertise on pay per click search engines will be prohibited from making many critcisms of the system as we know it. It may seem irrelevant to criticize affiliate programs. But think about what type of world you want to support with your money or with your click throughs.

To make it plain: Google Adwords prohibits sites from advertising on their pay per click service if the sites are critical of others. They make money off this policy every time you click on a link at the very top or the far right of the screen. Other affiliate programs prohibit sites from criticising the parent company or from supporting "illegal activity". I did avoid exchanging links with a mainstream looking shopping site that has a link to a bookie in Los Angeles (this is a real life example). But I would not want to be excluded for supporting Free Radio or for supporting medical marajuana.

To check out my site and to view an editorial I have written on this subject, visit www.pagesincolor.com .
 

Laughing at Wretching

Wow, "Wretching," you've sure changed my mind about Chomsky. I'll never waste my time reading him anymore.

Your cogent analysis of the situation is truly inspirational.

Thank you for all that you've shared with the world.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

This thread is making less and less sense.
 

can someone hand me a home brew beer?

if the thread doesn't make sense, can't imagine the conference. But 2 cents here, why can't some university sponsored conferences actually have some bread and butter folks? Some applied anarchists rather than just armchair folks?
 

Mix of speakers

"Some applied anarchists rather than just armchair folks?"

Maybe if you'd gone to the conference you'd know that this wasn't the case. The speakers were a mix of anarchist academics and on-the-ground, in-the-streets anarchists.

I enjoyed it immensely.
 

Get Off Your Ass, E-Nerd

For sure! And if you're so critical of armchair revolutionaries, why don't you get off the internet blogs and do something?
At least the people involved in the conference are doing that much.
Yours in hypocrisy.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Did someone record at least part of the conference?
If you did record it, but aren't sure how to upload it to indymedia, I can put you in touch with someone who can upload it. My e-mail is
pagesincolor (at) aol.com .
 

Re:If you did record it, but aren't sure how to upload

Yes I can operate VU meters and microphones and avoid feed back and record live dialogue. I just can't figure out how to click PUBLISH.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

I heard some of the conference on Free Radio Santa Cruz today... sounded good. There was even mention that the files would be uploaded here...

Good stuff.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

I was pretty dissapointed with the conference overall. But I'd like to say why and offer a suggestion for the future. I get the impression that many of the people involved see anarchism as a hobby for "academics" or "activists." Now, to speak of anarchism without talking about destroying the social roles of "academic" and "activist" is nonsense. The one speaker I particularly enjoyed, Barry Pateman, was introduced as a "scholar-activist" and he said something like, "well I don't know what that is," showing that he didn't wish to play that game. What I am getting at is that it is not in itself a problem to listen to some of the "academics" talk, nor is it a problem that they seemed uncomfortable labelling themeselves anarchists. What was dissapointing for me was that there was no exploration of anarchist theory and practice, least of all by people who are considered activists. What would have made an "Anarchism" conference more interesting for anarchists (and not just academics and activists) would have been more of a focus on smaller group discussions (even if they are introduced/facilitated by someone with a phd). This way ideas could be exchanged and challenged in a less impersonal environment (no lecture hall, microphones, etc.)
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

good points, Joe. I too prefer smaller circle discussions and I had trouble just sitting quietly in Oakes 105. My overall experience however, was positive. I'm greatful to all the folks that helped to organize this event and to everyone that showed up for the panels and discussions.

I missed the introductions and most of the first panel, but i really enjoyed lunch, both the food and the discussions, as well as the second panel and closing remarks.

Here are some photos from lunch:
santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17655/index.php

and, here is audio from the second panel and closing remarks:
santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17657/index.php

let's do it again sometime.
 

academia

Cody writes to e-nerd to get off his ass. My interest would be to see a conference on anarchism geared specifically towards developing a broader movement and understanding by people without a Phd in their name. I think one of the other poster's idea to have people break into smaller groups and actually interact (rather than simply talking heads) is a good suggestion as well.
 

Looking forward to Joe's Conference... When and Where?

Wow! This is great!

Joe and other anonymous folks are so clear and energetic about what is needed for a "good" @ conference.

So, I assume that THEY are already planning it. I look forward to seeing how their ACTIONS turn out. Cuz surely they're not the type of folks to just complain but not do ANYTHING about it, right?

>there was no exploration
>of anarchist theory and
>practice

Ummm... I remember that there was LOTS of opportunity for people to offer their own thoughts and perspectives, rather than merely ask questions of the "experts." So, why didn't YOU explore anarchist theory and practice?

Remember those discussion circles at lunch? Remember the request that ANYONE who wanted to should form their OWN circle to discuss whatever they wanted? WHY DIDN'T YOU STEP UP?

Direct action gets satisfaction.
 

Anarchism is dead

Anarachism as an advanced political expression of the working class died in 1917. Now it is a petit-bourgeouis movement that hates capitalism, but hates the idea of workers power (the dictatorship of the proletariat) even more -- the irrelevant death agony of a dying ancillary class, the petit-bourgeoisie.

Victory to the world-wide socialist revolution! Dictatorship of the proletariat now!
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Who would have thought Lenin was checking out santa cruz indy media? Learn something every day.
 

Lenin is Dead

As for the so-called "Marxist" movements, I think that Bakunin's early critique was quite perceptive. Particularly since 1917, Marxism -- or more accurately, Marxism-Leninism -- has become, as Bakunin predicted, the ideology of a "new class" of revolutionary intelligentsia who exploit popular revolutionary struggles to seize state power. They proceed to impose a harsh and authoritarian rule to destroy socialist institutions, as Lenin and Trotsky destroyed the factory councils and soviets. They will also do what they can to undermine and destroy moves towards authentic socialism elsewhere, if only because of the ideological threat. It is natural that the U.S.S.R. should have committed itself to the violent destruction of the popular revolution in Spain in 1936, just as workers councils in Hungary or democratic socialist tendencies in Czechoslovakia were intolerable to the "Red bureaucracy."

The appeal of these doctrines to the radical intelligentsia of the Third World is understandable. The doctrines justify their seizure of state power and their use of this centralized power. At best, they may construct a party dictatorship that is more or less benevolent, in that it will bring about a degree of modernization and development and improve health and welfare standards. Such achievements, if they take place, are not to be lightly dismissed, but they are also not to be confused with "socialism" in any sense of this term that is meaningful for the advanced industrial societies.

====

www.chomsky.info/interviews/19800203.htm
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

Wow, Chomsky is here too! Crazy.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference (5/7)

I would suggest as an example of maybe a model to follow for future conferences would be SEANet's convergence in Charleston(SEANet being the Southeast Anarchist Network....NOT a federation or a platformist group, but rather a loose knit, non-sectarian line of communication amongst anarchists in the southeast, regardless if they are anarcho-communists, syndicalist, mutalists, platformists, primitivists, post left, etc).

Anywho, rather then have set speakers and set group meetings (though we had some of those) we just had a large board with all the rooms we had available, times available, and left markers out for people to make up their own discussion groups. And it worked out fantastically. At our next convergence were hoping to expand the concept, as well as maybe allot times for more skill share or work group oriented seminars.

Some of the problems we hope to address isusing a PA system next year for big group meetings so people can hear everyone, as well as maybe encouraging people to make more concise group topics so more can be discussed around one issue as opposed to large umbrella conversations (though those are great too).

I must agree with some people on here though, the idea of an "anarchist" conference with panels is mildly disturbing, and hearing people kind of talk about anarchy as some sort of tool to "revitalize the left" is even more so, especially to those anarchists who are post-left (NOT the same as anarcho-capitalist), or primitivist, or who generally dislike the idea of being co-opted by what many feel is authoritarian leftist movements.
 

Re: Anarchism Now Conference / (((((roflmao)))))

How can we think adequately about anarchism’s place in current social movements?

anarchism has no place in organized social move ments. it would preclude the basic concept of anarchism to do so.
enclosure&privatization of anarchism ?
some one is out to line their pockets at our expense. don't fall for it. think for yourself
 

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Views

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software