Oh, but guy, the zios don't want to 'find solutions.' They want to keep everything just as it is, with the palis killing mad and lashing out in nihilistic rage. It's what sustains their prime excuse for killing "terrorists" year after year, until every Pali with a trace of political spine is dead. This is the same eugenics program used by U.S. genocidal bigots on populations of indigenous victims for 229 years, present action in the Persian Gulf being only the latest of hundreds of examples.

Meanwhile, zionist operatives like CT and Becky need to run around and try to stifle any analysis that might threaten this plan. I for one am outraged by the policing of leftist sites by these blatant supremacists, and I'll keep combatting them whenever I see it. I'll shut up when they shut up, and if that's never then so be it.

What's most telling about their "rebuttals' to my last point is that neither one really suceeds in reversing the impact of those statistics. Both their sources ALSO indict Israel much more than Palestine, especially when you add in the 'per-capita factor' (Israel has 4.8 million Jews; the occupied territories have 3.4 million Palestinians). But of course Becky and CT are slimy snakehole-slithering ideologues, so they both posture as if they've scored another big coup.

It's really quite interesting that CT points the reader to www.ifamericansknew.org . Absolutely, positively, go check it out, it's great. Check out their home page overview, though, not just the single-issue page he gives you. The site www.concert4palestine.org has an even punchier point-by-point comparative analysis ( www.concert4palestine.org/goliath/c.html ) and also a great historical overview of the 57-year orchestrated destruction of Palestine ( www.concert4palestine.org/palestine/c.html ). The last is an essay in the criminality of both the Israeli state and its Western imperial sponsors.

CT's reference to ifamericansknew.org is interesting because this can only mean he had no other choice. To 'contradict' my stats, he HAD to show you an "anti-zionist" source because the genocide-promoting sources he prefers don't trade in such comparisons at all -- they're inherently too damaging. All of this is useful in weighing his remarks about "honest Israeli pundits" -- as if in his hands this is anything but an oxymoron.