Critical Thinker: "The Land of Israel a.k.a Palestine WAS "a land without a people"

If you're "not defined" and recognized by some international body, or Zionists, as "a people" with "an internationally recognized name", or one recognized by Zionists, then you're not _people_ at all, and non-people have no rights at all, and thus no rights to even live where they do?

Some other people can then come along 2,000 years later to "reclaim" 'their' once ancient country?

We would have to move a lot of people back around in this world, and displace millions of others, if that were the standard and they wanted to reclaim their ancient land. Maybe starting with the Native Americans who's rights to do so are certainly a lot more valid than the Jews.

Btw, Becky said there was _no_ Palestine.

CT: "Benny Morris counts only 700,000 "Palestinian" refugees in 1947/1948"

Well, then that's okay? As long as it's not over "700,000", instead of at least 750,000? You, CT, sound like those holocaust deniers who say it wasn't really 6 million, but somewhat less, as though that makes a moral difference. Don't you think that's a little 'morally' petty, CT, to try to parse or minimize huge-scale mass human tragedy, especially for your being a Jew?

CT: "Becky Johnson doesn't feel the need to reply to your prying into her personal matters"

Why? Is she _embarrassed_ about having a Jewish husband, boyfriend, or relative, past or current? She did pointedly mentioned all her "dear" Jewish friends, although she said that they "are a big part of the _problem_". I bet Becky's "dear" Jewish friends would really appreciate hearing _that_ condescension from her. They won't even save themselves. They need _Becky_.

CT: "I have yet to see proof showing Barbara Lubin's version is the ultimate truth of what transpired."

If it weren't, then that would prove that the Palestinians have no rights, and no moral indigenous rights to live where the better part of a million of them lived back in 1948 alone? Not to mention those successively driven off in later waves?

If someone's "version wasn't the ultimate truth of what transpired" about whether or not a Nazi soldier killed a Jewish kid in Nazi Germany, that would 'prove' that Nazi-era Jews had no rights, especially no right to live in Germany?

CT: "As to those Jews in Santa Cruz...I'd guess most of them become intimidated by your likes rather easily. ... If I were living there I'd probably set up confidence building workshops..."

What you're saying, Critical Thinker, is that those Jews in Santa Cruz are pretty pathetic?