> when confronted with abject evil as occurred on 9/11.

What part of "Iraq was not involved in 9/11" don't you understand?

Suppose 11 Canadians were to hijack Chinese planes and crash them likewise into China. Would China be justified in attacking the US?

Because that's how much sense you're making.

Most of the hijackers were Saudi Arabians, not even Iraqis. How does that justify blaming Iraq?

Or suppose 11 guys from Chicago attacked Russia - could Russia then blame the whole USA including Washington and call for Bush to step down (not that Im any fan of ol' King George)?

Your own war fever should frighten even yourself.

You want to blame someone for 9/11? Blame the hijackers - they did it, after all. Oh, Im sorry, they're already dead and that leaves you with no one to vent your gang-mentality tribal anger upon. Tough.

Iraq has not attacked America. If Washington attacks Iraq now, Washington is guilty of terrorism - the same sort of terrorism they're already guilty of, after killing 3000 innocent Afghan civilians last year.

And that's just the tip of the geo-political iceberg. Washington has been attacking sovereign nations on false pretenses for decades now. The body count is staggering. Yet people like you are utterly blind to it.

If you want to wage war against global terrorism, send the US military to bomb Washington DC.

-Van