"Yeah Buddy, and some day you will be thankful that there were more perceptive people than you to take action on something that you were previously ignorant about."

Oh save us, Paul Revere!

"The photos on chemtrails911 are in no way shape or form contrails."

Oh, really? Tell us meterologically why these couldn't be normally occurring contrails. Go ahead, and by all means specifically cite any scientific text you'd like......we're all waiting.

"You don't have contrails in grid like patterns and criss cross patterns silly. that would go against all air traffic codes and be very dangerous."

First off, please go ahead and cite whatever "air traffic codes" that are being broken by planes' flight paths intersecting or running parallel with each other. Go ahead.....we're waiting for that one, too.

"These Chemtrails are in grid like, criss cross and other patterns, what about that?"

So, you're saying that planes that are on parallel courses are the ones spraying? Oh, but wait....it's also the ones who's flight paths intersect? Jeez.....isn't that every single plane flying? Also, have you ever heard of winds aloft and how this may play a factor in how your parallel persistent contrails are created? You don't have to be a genius to figure this out. As mentioned above, Occam's Razor sure comes in handy. Each and every one of these pictures are logically, scientifically explainable, and DO NOT show any violations of FAA regs (or whatever the hell your "flight codes" are, lol).

"What about the commonly known fact fact that normal jet contrails dissolve typically within a couple of minutes, but these Chemtrails always last for hours, slowly dispersing and dissolving, looking like clouds, then a misty haze?"

Normal persistent contrials have been shown to spread out and form cirrus layers since World War II.

"What about the fact that people see Chemtrails (which always last for hours) and normal jet contrails at the same time?"

Have you ever launched a weather balloon and seen how conditions in the atmosphere vary dramatically in as little altitude as 100 feet? Again.....easily explainable by ANY meteorologist.

"What about the fact that spray planes are regularly seen flying, spraying for a time over a an area, and then the line stops, as if switch has been TURNED OFF. A clear end in the line, and a clear beginning. Right over the city. What about that. None of the Chemtrai characteristics fall into line with normal jet contrail patterns."

Again, the atmosphere is FAR from being a fluid, calm, homogenous entity. Winds, pressure, temperature, humidity, etc. are all in a constant flux up at altitude. Have you ever been on a commercial airliner and flown through an "air pocket?" Again, easily explainable.

"And what about the fact that Will Thomas has documented statements from air traffic controllers that the chemtrail patterns were completely baffling them, as they had never seen anything like it before????"

This has been shown to be a hoax. Not one air traffic controller has come forth, even after Will said they would.

"The difference is massive, and if you even get a chance to have someone point out the difference to you in the sky, you will see it clear as day. There is no question about it."

Okay, somebody who amateurishly looks at the sky and can't even tell me the difference between high cirrus clouds and stratus is somehow qualified to tell me what a chemtrail is vs. a contrail? You mean someone who doesn't know FAA regs can look at intersecting trails and tell me that this is illegal? You mean someone who spends their lives in the ground (or in front of a computer) is qualified to tell an experienced pilot with 1000s of hours in the sky what is in the skies overhead?

"AS far as the "weather at flying altitudes" what we know is that contrails only happen at certain altitudes and temperatures, not all the time."

Yes and no. And, to be specific, what are these conditions by the way, and how does the NOAA gather this information and report it? Hmm?

"As far as testing. Great idea. Do you have some cash to put into the testing of air, water and earth samples, i'm sure it would yeild interesting results. Whatever it is they are spraying would have to come up in those samples."

Sure it would. Conjecture is the friend of the uninformed.

"The fact remains that there is a massive amount of chemicals being dispersed into our air. I would expect some evidence of this would have to come up in samples."

Maybe that's why we'd love to see some samples taken! After the four years+ of you chemheads' bitching and moaning, all you have to show for it is a bunch of rag-tag web sites. No organized money collection effort, no tests, nothing. See, none of you chemheads or your hoax promoters are willing to put their money where their mouths are, because it would spell certain doom for their cause. Why don't you ask Will Thomas to donate some of the proceeds from his book sales? Good luck!


"And by the way: the article on the governments previous proven documented spray operation really puts the Chemtrails in a totally viable light."

Yeah, right. Thousands of planes, thousands of pilots, operating around the clock all over the globe, and you call this a viable operation? Whatever, dude. Where are these 1000s of aircraft based, and who's doing the flying/ground support/air traffic control/etc.?