Santa Cruz Indymedia : http://santacruz.indymedia.org
Home
Santa Cruz Indymedia

LOCAL News :: Environment & Food

CHEMTRAILS911.COM

The Chemtrail issue has NOT dissapeared! The spray operation over Santa Cruz is relentless!!
The Chemtrail Spray Operation over Santa Cruz County is continuing relentlessly. If you need a quick reality check/education on the situation, just go to www.chemtrails911.com. and

_www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/hos.html

and www.lifeprobe.com

and www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm

and www.spirithelps.com/Chemtrails.htm




SEE A PHOTO OF A SPRAY PLANE IN ACTION!!!!!

THEY ARE COUNTING ON YOU NOT TO NOTICE WHAT THEY ARE DOING!!!

IT IS YOUR PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO EDUCATE YOURSELF AND FIND OUT THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS GOING ON HERE! Your families health is at stake!!!

You may hear people say: "yeah sure...the government is spraying us with chemicals, sure!"

or WHATEVER!!

Don't fall into the sheep mentality of brushing something off because your freinds do, or because it makes you stretch outside of your comfort zone.

Chemtrails is not a "fun" topic, it is not a "hobby" and it is not a "theory"!!!

Chemtrails are not just "one of many environmental toxins" like car exaust, normal
jet contrails etc.

Toxins from the environment are incidental byproducts. Chemtrails are PURPOSELY SPRAYED OVER US!!!

Big difference! Car exaust and normal jet "contrails" while may be toxic, are byproducts... they are not sprayed over us purposely!

These Chemtrails may be effecting you gradually, day after day, in ways you and me do not even know about.

These heavy metals, chemicals, and whatever unknown agents etc that may be in the spray are bonding with our lungs. They may be effecting our brain, our nervous and immune systems.

If we don't stop them now, by the time we find out what is going on here, it may be too late.

Think that is a joke? The government has a long history of spraying the populations, and we find out about it years, decades later.

THEY ALEARDY HAVE A PROVEN TRACK RECORD IN SPRAYING THE POPULACE!

Targeting the population with chemical agents without our consent is far from a conspiracy theory...it is documented FACT!!!

Folks, there is allot of bad shit going down on this planet right now. We are all very much outraged and fed up with the most evil lying administration that this country has ever had.

There are so many levels that this administrations policies are destroying everything we hold sacred and good in life.

From our "first strike" foreign policy, to our new Orwellian "homeland security" and "Patriot Acts 1 and 2" to the massive destruction of the environment, GM frankenfood, the tax plan for the rich, the crumbling economy, and on and on. You know the story.

Most people can not fathom the extent of what is actually being orchestrated. We must understand that all these policies are connected. There is one unifying theme here, that most people miss.


They know that this is their one chance to do what they have wanted to do for a long time.

In case you have not yet figured it out, their plan is to create a one world military fascist dictatorship within the next 5 years.

They will do this by staging more "terrorist attacks", creating and maintaining fear, and passing more and more draconian laws, bankrupting the economy, dumbing down the population of the U.S. with more pharmies, illusion based mind control media, and so many other factors which are sliding this country into a 4th reich.

You must know by now, that their plans include a massive genocide within the next couple of decades to slim down the population through.

You might as well know the truth.

They have been gradually weakening us and fucking with us in many ways. The pharmie/vaccination program, the lies and mind control of our schools, the "death care system (aka:health care), the Federal Reserve Lie, The IRS Lie, the corperate media, and on and on are designed to keep us sick, in debt, mind controlled and in fear.

This is all done consciously. It is orchestrated.

They know there are way too many aspects of all of this, and that we are way to stressed out and distracted for us to be able to keep up with it all, and put the dots together so we see what they are doing.

It is hard enough to simply keep up with the day to day of life!! Right?


How does the massive Chemtrail Spray Operation fit into all of this?

You'll have to come to your own conclusions.


What we do know is this: Santa Cruz is getting sprayed almost daily with unknown chemical agents. The rest of the country as well as other Nato countries are getting sprayed too.

We know this is illegal. We know for sure that whatever they are spraying us with is not good for us. We know they are hiding and denying the operation, even though it will known among hundreds of thousands of people from all over the country, and beyond.

If it was good for us, if was legal, they wouldn't hesitate to tell us, right?

Why would they hide it and deny it unless there was some sinister reason?

Think about it.

This is a MULTI BILLION DOLLAR INTERNATIONAL PROJECT! This is potentially the largest covert operation that has EVER happened on the planet!

As a model city, we have an opportunity to bring this HUGE and undereported issue to public awareness, to the point where they HAVE to stop.

If we can do it in Santa Cruz, it can happen other places.
If we can't stop them in Santa Cruz, good luck stopping them elsewhere!

It is Thursday. The Chemtrails are all over the sky. We saw the spray planes in action!

Whatever day you are reading this, there are probably trails in the sky.

Go to www.chemtrails911.com and get clear on what they look like, and the massive amount of documentation that proves this is happening.

Then look up. much of the "clouds" and mist and haze that you see in the sky, are Chemtrails from hours ago that have slowly dispersed and spread out. If you watch them over hours you will see that they often end up remarkably LOOKING like normal clouds. Don't be fooled. This Chem haze is in our skies almost daily. Night time spraying dissolves by morning so we wake up to saturated air. No shit folks. They spray virtually every night, all over.
White unmarked kc135 airforce tankers are flying consistantly over our skies. You can see them if you look!

These are the same planes photo identified all over the country. There are PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF THE SPRAY OPERATION IN PROGRESS!

Santa Cruz, don't be lulled into a semi sleep with our comfortable lifestyle here...

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY URGENT!!!

They are slowly weakening and sickening us with a massive, relentless (daily) spraying of our atmosphere.


The earth is round. It's not "all good", and yes, the government has and is spraying you daily.

what are we going to do about it????
 
 


New Comments are disabled, please visit Indybay.org/SantaCruz

Comments

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

No shit. I saw a plane spraying a trail ealier, and there are chemtrails over us again. This is madness.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

on your website is annoying. have someone who knows design fix your site.
 

MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THINGS I CAN PROVE

I'VE SEEN THE PLANES, I'VE SEEN THE CHEMTRAILS IN THE SKY. I BELEIVE CHEMTRAILS ARE BEING SPRAYED FOR *SOME REASON*, BUT... (imagine someone shouting) ***I CANNOT PROVE IT***... I, FOR ONE AM FAR MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THINGS I *CAN* PROVE, LIKE THE *FACT* THAT BUSH LIED ABOUT THE REASONS FOR THE IRAQ WAR, THE PATRIOT ACT *IS* REALLY STRIPPING AMERICANS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, CORPORATE POWER HAS RUN AMOK, ETC...ETC...ETC... I COULD GO ON, BUT YOU SEE WHERE I'M GOING... LETS WORK TO CHANGE THINGS WE *CAN* PROVE... RANTING AND RAVING ABOUT CHEMTRAILS MAKES YOU LOOK AND SOUND REALLY FOOLISH WHEN THERE ARE *REAL* PROBLEMS WE CAN ALL SEE QUITE CLEARLY
 

stop spamming this site

stop
posting
all
over
this
site
using
different
user
names
and
taking
up
valuable
space
this
is
inconsiderate

thankyou
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

There is plenty of room on this website. No one is spamming here at all. You should be thankful that someone is taking the time to expose this. This information is as valuable as any other, and is shared with passion and respect...and urgency!

There is tons of evidence showing the reality of the Chemtrail operation. If you knew the truth of the matter, it would totally blow your mind. You would immediately humble yourself and realize what many of us have...the "hard to imagine" is in this case a daily accurance. It is so much in all of our faces that people don't notice. If you look up and pay attention, and do a minimum amount of checking out some photos to see what they look like, you will one day look up and be rudely awakened. The chemtrails are in our sky almost daily! The dispersed trails look like clouds, but when you know what to look for, it is OBVIOUS.

We are all simple in many ways. The way our mind works is that when something shows up in our environment, we search automatically for links that we are familiar with. When you look up and see chemtrails, your mind tells you clouds. It is familiar, and you don't know anything else.

It is mind control folks. They know you aren't noticing. They know you want to stay comfortable and protest things far away. This is RIGHT ABOVE US EVERY DAY!!! You are conditioned NOT to notice!

It is totally amazing. For those of you who think this Chemtrail issue is a load of paranoid crap, one day you will wake up and see it was not.

We need you NOW to wake up and know the truth of the matter! Please don't wait!!!

The most amazing thing about this is that even people on the "left" who are hip to the obvious stuff, are fast asleep to the Chemtrails.

FOLKS, THE ENTIRE SKY OF SANTA CRUZ IS COVERED WITH THE SHIT RIGHT NOW.

Don't think you are so smart because you figured out that Bush is lying about Iraq etc and think you know a fraction of the story. You don't.

Anyone can figure out the obvious stuff! Don't pride yourself!

The sky in downtown Santa Cruz has tons of dispersed Chemtrails, and they are doing it right under (above) your nose.

They even have the "left" fooled. shit, they have really got us from all directions.


Stay asleep to the Chemtrails while you focus on the obvious issues. Stay comfortable. Be a pawn in their game. Is that what you want??? I DON'T THINK SO.

And how do you know that those are normal jet contrails or clouds in the sky. You don't. And they are not.

It's easy to critique the government on the basic crap. And it's totally necessary. But the joke is on all of us.

We are getting sprayed, every day, and weather we are aware of it or not does not change the fact even slightly.

They WANT you to put down those who would expose this.

Don't you get it? They have conditioned you NOT to believe the truth when you find out about it.

This is not a power struggle or an ego battle...Far from it! WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!!!

It is exactly the same as Galileo (was it) who said that the earth is round. NO ONE BELIEVED HIM!!! They thought he was totally nuts!!!

Are YOU a member of the "Flat Earth Society"???!!!

Don't you understand that they are manipulating the "left" as much as the "right". There are tons of sheeple on the left. Well meaning, but sadly ignorant and naive about what is really happening.

There are many branches of this evil tree.

Chemtrails is one of the branches...and an especially insidious, covert and sinister one.

If we shed light (awareness) onto their dark plans, they will be exposed. Darkness cannot exist where there is light.

Denying the Chemtrails and ridiculing those who are exposing it is taking a stand that you want to remain in darkness, in ignorance.

It is falling RIGHT INTO THEIR TRAP.

Please wake up, so you can help others to awaken.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Go to: www.lifeprobe.com

see the proof for yourself.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

This letter was posted to the main chemtrail article on this site. It is very relevant for this discussion.

by JD
nospam (at) got.net (unverified) 13 Aug 2003
To the debunkers

Chemtrails outlaw
The government says they don’t exist, but Kucinich wants Congress to take action

by Bob Fitrakis

The debate surrounding the federal government’s alleged weather modification experiments has landed in the U.S. Capitol, thanks to Cleveland Democrat Dennis Kucinich. Representative Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 on October 2 last year, seeking a “permanent ban on [the] basing of weapons in space.?

The bill, HR 2977, specifically outlaws a variety of weapons detailed in the December 6, 2001, Columbus Alive article “Stormy Weather,? which exposed allegations of secret government aerial spraying activities. Kucinich’s bill explicitly outlaws “chemtrails.?

Alive asked Kucinich why he would introduce a bill banning so-called chemtrails when the U.S. government routinely denies such things exist and the U.S. Air Force has routinely called chemtrail sightings “a hoax.?

“The truth is there’s an entire program in the Department of Defense, ‘Vision for 2020,’ that’s developing these weapons,? Kucinich responded. Kucinich says he plans to reintroduce a broader version of the bill later this month. “Plasma, electromagnetics, sonic or ultrasonic weapons [and] laser weapons systems? were among those banned by HR 2977.

Two scientists working at Wright Patterson Air Force Base informed Alive of the ongoing secret experiments, one involving weather modification and the other involving the creation of an aerial antenna using a barium stearate chemical trail. The scientists referred to the work of legendary inventor Nikola Tesla. Before Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars?), there was Tesla’s vision of high-tech space-based warfare and weather modification.

According to Tesla biographer Margaret Cheney, federal agents seized Tesla’s papers after his death in 1943. “[At] least one set of Tesla’s papers had reached Wright Field [now Wright Patterson Air Force Base],? Cheney wrote. The Aeronautic Systems Division at Wright Patterson admitted it had the Tesla papers but claim they were “destroyed.?

However, Tesla’s dream is embodied in a glossy brochure titled “Vision for 2020? released by the U.S. Space Command in 1998. The brochure states, “The emerging synergy of space superiority with land, sea and air superiority will lead to Full Spectrum Dominance.?

The Space Command spells out its purpose pretty plainly: “Dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect U.S. interests and investment.?

There’s nothing new here, for those who have been paying attention. In the 1970s, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, bluntly stated in his book Between Two Ages, “Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need to be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.?

On January 4 this year, Canadian Professor Michel Chossudovsky, of the Center for Research on Globalization at the University of Ottawa, issued a report noting that weapons have the ability to trigger climate changes. “Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the world’s climate. In the U.S., the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),? Chossudovsky wrote. “Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction.?

Doubters of the military’s secret plans should refer to George and Meredith Friedman’s The Future of War, Power, Technology and American World Dominance in the 21st Century. The Friedmans, government-touted “arms experts? and favorites of the military-industrial complex, assert that “The American experience of power will rest on the domination of space.?

The U.S. Air Force giddily embraced the Friedmans’ thesis in the 1996 report “New World Vistas: Air And Space Power For The 21st Century.? The Air Force report notes, “In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict.?

State University of New York Professor of Journalism Karl Grossman, writing in 1999, revealed how the mainstream corporate press virtually ignores the government’s pronouncements while trade journals like Space News, Defense News, Aviation Week, Space Technology and Electronic Engineering Times routinely report on the military-industrial complex’s high-tech breakthroughs.

As for chemtrail skeptics, they might want to consult Rutgers University Political Science Professor Leonard Cole’s book Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Test Over Populated Areas. Chemtrail deniers are apparently happy with the thought that their beloved paternalistic government would engage in aerial spraying over densely populated areas.

U.S. Representative Marty Sabo, a Democrat from Minnesota, denounced “the secret Army program to spray Minneapolis and other cities with chemicals in the 1950s and ’60s,? the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported in September 1994. “The idea that the government would use its own citizens as guinea pigs is appalling, and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms,? Sabo told a House subcommittee investigating the secret spraying, which used fluorescent tracers to mark wind patterns.

As for the Army, it argues that the secret Cold War-era spraying was not “human experimentation? since it didn’t target any specific individuals and the zinc cadmium sulfide used was harmless. But the International Agency for Research on Cancer lists all cadmium compounds as known cancer-causing agents.

Former students of Clinton Elementary in south Minneapolis told an investigating panel from the National Research Council that the Army’s secret chemical spraying adversely affected their health, according to the Star Tribune.

Skeptics who continue to insist the government would never be involved in secret aerial spraying, particularly in Ohio, may want to address their questions to the C-130 aircrews from the 910th Airlift Wing stationed at Youngstown’s Air Reserve Station. In July 2000, an Air Force press release bragged, “Fifteen service members from military installations in Germany and England were at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, 8-12 May, learning how to use chemicals to destroy the enemy… The seven airmen and eight soldiers learned how to plan, execute and oversee the entire process of applying pesticides by air.? The press release said the Youngstown air unit will only be used against “insects with their deadly diseases.?

Apparently insects take many forms. During the Seattle demonstrations against the World Trade Organization in November 1999, CNN reported that a military air unit with pathogen capacity to induce sickness in humans was deployed against the demonstrators.

January 24, 2002

Note: They are real, very real. I have seen them since moving here in 1998. Debunker=sheeple
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

You people are something else. What? I don't know, but something else for sure.

Enlighten yourself to several links here: worldzone.net/international/chickiedeb/index.shtml
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

You people are complete morons. Why don't you take a meteorolgy class and learn up on aviation before you buy into this baloney. Us pilots have enough crap these days without you sickos pointing fingers at us and telling us we're making you sick by spraying you. What about our friends and families? We must be spraying them, too, right? Get a clue......think before you spout this kind of nonsense!

This kind of crap gives Indymedia a bad name......as if it wasn't leftist propaganda already.

Oh, and by the way, Kucinich dropped chemtrails like a hot potato long ago! Oopsie!
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Kucinich dropped Chemtrails externally because of political reasons. What, do you think he authored a bill in Congress including the banning of space weapons including chemtrails, but made a mistake about the reality of chemtrails? Obviously not.

For your information, we have a direct quote from him at the Vet's Hall saying that chemtrails are real. OK, smart guy?


With all due respect, these dubunkers sound like morons. It is human pychology (for not very intelligent people) to need to put down others to feel right or superior, or to protect your version of reality. If something comes in from outside your world that challenges directly your perceptions of reality, this kind of person will use sarcastic humor and belittling and anything rather than have to readjust.

This "stupid american" kind of debunker mentality is the same dumbed down, arrogantly and ignorantly self riteous mood that the americans display all over the place.

I know you think your cool and smart for saying that "this kind of stuff is what gives indymedia a bad name" (which of course is totally rediculous as there is all kinds of topics covered on this site. But you don't seem to care for ANY of this site, which invalidates your comments anyway and which you confirm in your next statement:) "as if it wasn't leftist propaganda already"

Oh yeah big guy? And who are you? A Michael Savage devotee? You sound like the same kind of stupid mentality.

YOU ARE CALLING INDYMEDIA LEFTIST PROPAGANDA?

You just totally exposed your own ass.


whose the moron really????
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

By the way...you are NOT a pilot. Obviously.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Good point about the pilots families.It is a very important point, and a really good question.

Sadly, the powers that are orchestrating this could not give a flying fuck about the pilots or their families, or the cops or the republicans or anyone else that are all getting sprayed as well.

Many times military and covert operations are preformed by people who do not know the full reason and effect of their actions. They are useful pawns for their dark plans.

Just like the men in our military are useful pawns to fight illegal wars in OTHER lands, not knowing the truth of what they are fighting for.

Sad but true. The full knowlege of the spray operation is only known at the highest levels of government. Those who do know are told not to speak, and they don't.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Typical chemtrail believers:


pub8.ezboard.com/fchemtrailschemtrails.showMessage

(be sure to scroll though all 3 pages)

groups.yahoo.com/group/LLNews2/

(Larry Lawson, AKA Crazy Larry)

Here is ap particularly sad case:

www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001895.html

www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001659.html


Can anyone here honestly state that this one is Not a little 'teched?

www.prweb.com/releases/2003/6/prweb67503.php


And one more among many:

www.carnicom.com/time2.htm
www.carnicom.com/meeting.htm

An interesting and fun bunch of kooks to be sure.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

"Kucinich dropped Chemtrails externally because of political reasons. What, do you think he authored a bill in Congress including the banning of space weapons including chemtrails, but made a mistake about the reality of chemtrails? "

It was one of his over-eager staffers who wrote the bill, and is slipped by Kucinich. It was dropped from the bill and the bill was re-introduced. When asked about "chemtrails" recently, Kucinich did his best to distance himself from the subject. Face it, moron. You lost.

"For your information, we have a direct quote from him at the Vet's Hall saying that chemtrails are real. OK, smart guy?"

Oh yeah? WE? (heh,heh) Give me the quote, and please provide a reliable source. Not as if it matters, anyway. Kucinich is a freakin' moron, just as bad as you chemtrail believers are. If by the small chance he does get the democratic nomination, you can rest assured that the republicans will make "chemtrails" a household name. And that WON'T be good news for you chemheads.

As for our jab at me being a pilot or not, does it really matter? All's I know is that I fly every day in an unfiltered cabin that flies right through your precious "chemtrails" all of the time. I'm not sick, my family's not sick, and neither are any of my friends or co-workers. "Chemtrails" are easily explained as persistent contrails, and Occam's Razor applies to all of these cockamamie theories of yours. Go learn some meteorology, and quit believing what your favorite conspiracy promoters tell you. It'll make life a lot more enjoyable if you weren't thinking that everyone was out to get you.

"Sad but true. The full knowlege of the spray operation is only known at the highest levels of government. Those who do know are told not to speak, and they don't. "

Bwahahaha! This is such pure unadulterated bullshit I don't even think it merits a response. Okay, I'll humor you. Do you really think that people in the military are like this? Do you know the differenc ebetween a lawful order and an unlawful one, and a service member's OBLIGATION to disobey an unlawful order? Who's getting sick in the military with this obvious spray operation going on, anyway? With all of the pilots, and ground crew that work around this stuff all of the time, surely you'd think that people would be dropping like flies. Well, where are they? When are commercial pilots going to be told not to fly through these trails to keep passengers from getting sick in the concentrated spray-goo you think is up there? Ignorance prevails.

Indymedia IS a leftist propaganda site. It is NOT independent. Anarchists, Workers World Party idiots, Socialists, Greens, and other fringe groups rule this organization. Show me one article here that praises anything that George W. Bush has done since his election.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

There is nothing positive bush has done since being in office. The fact that you would ask that question reveals how dumb you are!

This "dubunker" who is going by many names and attacking the truth of chemtrails is a KNOWN DEBUNKER. HE GOES FROM SITE TO SITE TRYING TO TEAR DOWN THOSE WHO WOULD REVEAL THE TRUTH OF CHEMTRAILS!

You can read all about this idiot at:

www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/debunking.html
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Why are you even on this "leftist propaganda" site? You should be glued to Savage Nation and Fox news, so that you can stay focused on the truth. Work for the fed? Nothing better to do with your time?

You don't even have the intelligence to realize that your own words expose you.

First: you are totally wrong about kucinich. You obviously do not know what you are talking about. And incidentally, we DO have a statement from him.

You are obviously disinfo, either knowingly as a drone, or unkowingly as a dumb loud mouth person.

Either way. Your ass is totally exposed.

As far as "lawful" or "unlawful" orders, once again your idiocy is laughable. Military and government personal carry out "unlawful orders" all the time. The whole fucking foriegn policy of this country is an "unlawful order" asshole.

People doing illegal or immoral operations arent always told what they are doing. Hardly. They are just carrying out orders.

Do you have any clue how many illegal things the U.S. government pulls all the time? Probably not, from the sounds of your sorry ass.

There are all kinds of ways to protect pilots from what they are spraying. The government is not as dumb as you are.

And people die and get sick in mass in the U.S. Armed forces all the time. Hundreds of thousands, and the gov denies it, and the media covers it up...ever hear of agent orange? depleted uranium? and so many other examples of illegal, immoral, covert operations involving illegal chemicals, weapons of ALL kinds and literally tons of acts of malace and harm to the people of this planet.

Where have you been? Fast asleep I guess.

You are a perfect pathetic example of the stupid american man. You have been dumbed down and mindcontrolled and you don't even know it.

Who do you love? What do you care about? What does this planet mean to you? What do YOU think about this current administrations policies?

What do you think about the war in Iraq? What do you think about shrubs environmental poplicy? What do you think about the lies that this administraion has pulled off so far in office?
What do you think about the cover up about 9-11?

What do you think about the many documented cases of our gov spraying the populaions without their consent, with toxic agents? Doesn't that appear to give a track record for doing these kinds of things, and covering up/lying about it, so that by the time we find out about it is years later with a small blurb at the back of the paper...


What do YOU, thoughtful citizen think of these topics. This will show us who you really are.


Since you obviously don't really know what you are talking about, and are specifically 100% WRONG about the Chemtrails, what is your motivation for being here.

I am here to alert my friends and family in Santa Cruz to this present danger to our health and wellbeing. What is "unpopular" now, will be common knowledge later on.

The earth is round? Leftist kook!!!


Your angy stupid armor is your prison. Step out. Wake up. Use your energy and passion for truth and ritiousness, not just apologizing for darkness and lies. Or be a coward.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

>>"I am here to alert my friends and family in Santa Cruz to this present danger to our health and wellbeing. What is "unpopular" now, will be common knowledge later on. "<<

Yeah buddy, that's the song of the chemmies for the last 4 years. Btw, nice photos of contrails on your website there. Try Flight Explorer to see where those lines of clouds and ice crystals are born. Why do you see them on some days and not others? What do you know about the weather at flying altitudes? What the heck is a chemtrail, anyway? Give us the name and location of any lab performing any tests as well as method of collection. Please, we have been waiting so long for you enightened ones to bring forth the tangible and verifiable proof. And please, don't refer me to Carnicom, Jeff Rense or Chemtrail Central. None of those people are scientifically qualified and have not provided tangible proof, either. You've been had by an internet hoax.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Yeah Buddy, and some day you will be thankful that there were more perceptive people than you to take action on something that you were previously ignorant about.

The photos on chemtrails911 are in no way shape or form contrails. You don't have contrails in grid like patterns and criss cross patterns silly. that would go against all air traffic codes and be very dangerous. These Chemtrails are in grid like, criss cross and other patterns, what about that?

What about the commonly known fact fact that normal jet contrails dissolve typically within a couple of minutes, but these Chemtrails always last for hours, slowly dispersing and dissolving, looking like clouds, then a misty haze?

What about the fact that people see Chemtrails (which always last for hours) and normal jet contrails at the same time?

What about the fact that spray planes are regularly seen flying, spraying for a time over a an area, and then the line stops, as if switch has been TURNED OFF. A clear end in the line, and a clear beginning. Right over the city. What about that. None of the Chemtrai characteristics fall into line with normal jet contrail patterns.

And what about the fact that Will Thomas has documented statements from air traffic controllers that the chemtrail patterns were completely baffling them, as they had never seen anything like it before????

The difference is massive, and if you even get a chance to have someone point out the difference to you in the sky, you will see it clear as day. There is no question about it.

AS far as the "weather at flying altitudes" what we know is that contrails only happen at certain altitudes and temperatures, not all the time.

As far as testing. Great idea. Do you have some cash to put into the testing of air, water and earth samples, i'm sure it would yeild interesting results. Whatever it is they are spraying would have to come up in those samples. The reason being that even though cynical big mouths like you would love to debunk the story away, unfortunately for all of us, it isn't going anywhere. The fact remains that there is a massive amount of chemicals being dispersed into our air. I would expect some evidence of this would have to come up in samples.


The earth is round? Yeah right!

And by the way: the article on the governments previous proven documented spray operation really puts the Chemtrails in a totally viable light.

Be an ostrich if you like Chickiedeb. It's your choice. You can consider yourself a proud card carrying member of the flat earth society. Good for you.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

"There is nothing positive bush has done since being in office. The fact that you would ask that question reveals how dumb you are! "

Ha ha.....boy, I couldn't have proved it any better than you kooks did yourself. Kucinich/Nader in '04, NOT!(snicker)
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

"Yeah Buddy, and some day you will be thankful that there were more perceptive people than you to take action on something that you were previously ignorant about."

Oh save us, Paul Revere!

"The photos on chemtrails911 are in no way shape or form contrails."

Oh, really? Tell us meterologically why these couldn't be normally occurring contrails. Go ahead, and by all means specifically cite any scientific text you'd like......we're all waiting.

"You don't have contrails in grid like patterns and criss cross patterns silly. that would go against all air traffic codes and be very dangerous."

First off, please go ahead and cite whatever "air traffic codes" that are being broken by planes' flight paths intersecting or running parallel with each other. Go ahead.....we're waiting for that one, too.

"These Chemtrails are in grid like, criss cross and other patterns, what about that?"

So, you're saying that planes that are on parallel courses are the ones spraying? Oh, but wait....it's also the ones who's flight paths intersect? Jeez.....isn't that every single plane flying? Also, have you ever heard of winds aloft and how this may play a factor in how your parallel persistent contrails are created? You don't have to be a genius to figure this out. As mentioned above, Occam's Razor sure comes in handy. Each and every one of these pictures are logically, scientifically explainable, and DO NOT show any violations of FAA regs (or whatever the hell your "flight codes" are, lol).

"What about the commonly known fact fact that normal jet contrails dissolve typically within a couple of minutes, but these Chemtrails always last for hours, slowly dispersing and dissolving, looking like clouds, then a misty haze?"

Normal persistent contrials have been shown to spread out and form cirrus layers since World War II.

"What about the fact that people see Chemtrails (which always last for hours) and normal jet contrails at the same time?"

Have you ever launched a weather balloon and seen how conditions in the atmosphere vary dramatically in as little altitude as 100 feet? Again.....easily explainable by ANY meteorologist.

"What about the fact that spray planes are regularly seen flying, spraying for a time over a an area, and then the line stops, as if switch has been TURNED OFF. A clear end in the line, and a clear beginning. Right over the city. What about that. None of the Chemtrai characteristics fall into line with normal jet contrail patterns."

Again, the atmosphere is FAR from being a fluid, calm, homogenous entity. Winds, pressure, temperature, humidity, etc. are all in a constant flux up at altitude. Have you ever been on a commercial airliner and flown through an "air pocket?" Again, easily explainable.

"And what about the fact that Will Thomas has documented statements from air traffic controllers that the chemtrail patterns were completely baffling them, as they had never seen anything like it before????"

This has been shown to be a hoax. Not one air traffic controller has come forth, even after Will said they would.

"The difference is massive, and if you even get a chance to have someone point out the difference to you in the sky, you will see it clear as day. There is no question about it."

Okay, somebody who amateurishly looks at the sky and can't even tell me the difference between high cirrus clouds and stratus is somehow qualified to tell me what a chemtrail is vs. a contrail? You mean someone who doesn't know FAA regs can look at intersecting trails and tell me that this is illegal? You mean someone who spends their lives in the ground (or in front of a computer) is qualified to tell an experienced pilot with 1000s of hours in the sky what is in the skies overhead?

"AS far as the "weather at flying altitudes" what we know is that contrails only happen at certain altitudes and temperatures, not all the time."

Yes and no. And, to be specific, what are these conditions by the way, and how does the NOAA gather this information and report it? Hmm?

"As far as testing. Great idea. Do you have some cash to put into the testing of air, water and earth samples, i'm sure it would yeild interesting results. Whatever it is they are spraying would have to come up in those samples."

Sure it would. Conjecture is the friend of the uninformed.

"The fact remains that there is a massive amount of chemicals being dispersed into our air. I would expect some evidence of this would have to come up in samples."

Maybe that's why we'd love to see some samples taken! After the four years+ of you chemheads' bitching and moaning, all you have to show for it is a bunch of rag-tag web sites. No organized money collection effort, no tests, nothing. See, none of you chemheads or your hoax promoters are willing to put their money where their mouths are, because it would spell certain doom for their cause. Why don't you ask Will Thomas to donate some of the proceeds from his book sales? Good luck!


"And by the way: the article on the governments previous proven documented spray operation really puts the Chemtrails in a totally viable light."

Yeah, right. Thousands of planes, thousands of pilots, operating around the clock all over the globe, and you call this a viable operation? Whatever, dude. Where are these 1000s of aircraft based, and who's doing the flying/ground support/air traffic control/etc.?
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Folks, it has been brought to our attention that there is a known chemtrail debunker who is on this site refuting the truth. His name is Chickiedeb but goes by other names on this site as well. Mr. debunker, your ass is now officially totally exposed! You can read all about this idiot at:
www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/debunking.html




You've got so many facts twisted and wrong, so much disinformation and wrong information, and you are so obviously a total asshole that I am not even going to bother wasting more time with you.

I have learned in this life to disengage from energy sucking deluded entities such as yourself.

Nothing personal. Just not interested in constantly rebutting all of your very wrong information and distortion of facts. There is nothing in it for me. This information is for those thoughtful and intelligent people in this community who are concerned about their health and the environment.

No offense, but there is only so much time in the day. Have fun mr "pilot".
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

"You've got so many facts twisted and wrong, so much disinformation and wrong information, and you are so obviously a total asshole that I am not even going to bother wasting more time with you.

I have learned in this life to disengage from energy sucking deluded entities such as yourself.

Nothing personal. Just not interested in constantly rebutting all of your very wrong information and distortion of facts. There is nothing in it for me. This information is for those thoughtful and intelligent people in this community who are concerned about their health and the environment.

No offense, but there is only so much time in the day. Have fun mr "pilot"."


In other words, you just got toasted and can't face the fact.

You are a science illiterate, a loser and a maroon.

LOL
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

laugh yourself to sleep. Your ignorance and arrogance are not going to save you.

And clearly you are not interested in an intelligent dialoge here, so you can spin your wheels as much as you like...but this isn't about you. So have fun mr "pilot". Go get a job for homeland security or something. You'd be useful there! Any one who would so passionately DENY the chemtrails is pretty suspect. You have already expolsed yourself as a total idiot a along time ago. And by the way, you never answered the questions earlier, including what Good has shrub done in office?

As someone else posted recently: debunker=sheeple.

That means you.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Contrails Vs Chemtrails -


Facts And Chronology
From Kim Weber <ohwarriorgoddess (at) earthlink.net>
5-23-00




I. Contrail vs. Chemtrail.

A. A contrail dispurses. A chemtrail spreads into cloud cover and sometimes has fallout (cob-web like filaments, red/yellow powders, milky-white fluid).

II. Purposes (??? weather modification, protection from ozone holes, bio-vaccination, culling - ???)

A. Weather modification.

* Openly stated goal of the U.S. Military is "owning the weather" www.au.af.mil/au/database/research/ay1996/acsc/9025ag.htm

* UN environmental Program "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" www.ipcc.ch

* UN "Capacity Development Initiative" on climate change ... in partnership with THE WORLD BANK as financiers (remember Seattle protests) www.gefweb.org/Capacity_Dev.pdf

* Dr. Bernard Eastlund took up the Tesla theories. Eastlund released his research and concernns on the internet AFTER the military took over, to cover his butt. www.borderlands.com/newstuff/research/HPEMRAD/Eastlund.htm

* When DOD took over Dr. Eastlund's research, the birth of HAARP took place. HAARP is based in Alaska and it is being applied to the Earth's ionosphere for weather control and mind control purposes. "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", Dr. Nick Begich [Earthpulse Press, PO Box 201393, Anchorage, AK 99520]; Concerned citizens group paper at www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project116.html

* US Air Force IS involved. Early April 2000, KC135s were grounded and during the period immediately following spraying reports across the US significantly dropped. See clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailtrackingusa (OVER 700 members - daily reports to track) Also see the research of William Thomas (Author, "The Scorched Earth", "Bringing The War Home", "Probing the Chemtrail Conundrum") www.islandnet.com/~wilco/investsky.htm (Email: wilco (at) islandnet.com).

* Our weathermen KNOW. The data doesn't support the cloud cover. For instance, last year in Sante Fe, NM there was a 21-day period of continuous clouud cover when humidity/dew point levels were no higher than 30%. Clouds can only form when humidity/dew point levels are 60% of higher. HOW DID THE CLOUDS FORM?? (see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

B. There has definitely been biological warfare testing of UNKNOWING U.S. citizens and OUR GOVERNMENT IS FULLY AWARE OF IT.

* 1977 hearings before the U.S. Senate Committee on Human Resources SubCommittee on Health and Scientific Research (see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

* AGAIN 5/6/94 U.S. Senate testimony of Dr. Leonard Cole (Author, "Clouds of Secrecy") before the Committee on Veteran's Affairs (see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

* 3 segments aired on ABC / Ted Kopple's "Nighline" which included the testimony of Peter Kawaja on the biowarfare exposure of Gulf War vets. Of the initial 697,000 soldiers deployed to the Gulf War, 489,400+ (70%) are now discharged, 1000s have died and are dying, 67% of their babies born after are born deformed, family/friends/doctors/nurses becoming sick. Mycoplasmas are a part of their sickness.

* UN Wildlands Project - the "re-wilding of America". 50% of the United States is being set aside for global parklands with NO HUMANS ALLOWED. Papers state "human population must be reduced." Concerned citizens site www.wildlandsproject.org/htm/summary.htm

* Damning patents. U.S. patent 5534413 for invasive mycoplasma infection (isolated from the urine of AIDS patients), and THE VACCINE YOU NEVER EVER HEAR ABOUT U.S. Patent 5242820. Mycoplasmas can cause Epstein-Barr/mono, lupus, ALS, MS, meningitis, lymphoma, leukemia, alzheimers, Crohn's Disease, PID, arthritis, fibromyalgia, allergies, asthma etc etc etc. members.aol.com/ghylak/mycoplasma.htm and www.gulfwarvets.com/article24.htm

* Lab results from ground samples taken from 2 unassociated parties (Sacramento and E.Oregon) after flyovers from unmarked aircraft reveal biowarfare bacterias named in over 160 Pentagon patents referencing biowarfare applications, toxic molds, ethylene dibromide (a pesticide banned by the EPA which damages lungs/heart/liver/kidneys). (See www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm). "The flu that's not the flu" - hospitals filled to capacity TURNING AWAY patients: "THIS VIRUS IS A MUCH MORE SUCCESSFUL PARASITE", Dr. W. Paul Glezen of the Influena Research Center at Baylor. NEVER has "parasite" been associated with a "virus". A parasite FEEDS FROM THE HOST. A virus, on the other hand, NEEDS A SUSCEPTIBLE HOST'S CELLS TO MULTIPLY. What's Dr. Glezen talking about? Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz states: "Based on the evidence that my colleagues and I have accumulated, I conclude that this flu-like illness IS most likely associated with chemical and biological co-factors." His email: tetra (at) tetrahedron.org.

* Florescent black light reveals filaments - LOTS - which glows blue, red/orange. Contains barium titanate?, a dielectric used to keep electricity flowing. Using this to : trap moisture to create clouds; build up earth pressures to cause earthquakes, tornados, volcanic eruptions; to create extra tension and stress in humans. The fibers are in a twisted ribbon shape ~3-5 microns thick by ~10 to 13 microns wide. They have imperfections that manifest as small clumps of polymer whiskers ~.5 to 1 micron in diameter by ~5 to 10 microns long. There are large enough by themselves and in sufficient quantity to cause possible long-lasting lung disease. WHERE ARE YOU AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION??

* A microsopic particle count study in New Mexico shows a 16% increase in the magnitude of the average microscopic particle count data of 1999 vs. the average of the COMBINED YEARS of 1996, 1997 and 1998. The difference is significant - at the 99.9% plus level. The conclusion reached is that the microscopic air particle count in New Mexico in 1999 is STRIKINGLY different from that of the preceding 3 years combined. (See www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm).

C. Ominous developments.

* Unusual truck activity across the U.S. Trimac Western tanker trucks that DO NOT display DOT placard codes giving their contents, being WAVED THRU mandatory truck inspection stops! People who slow down to take a "look-see" are being shadowed 20-30 miles by civilian cars escorting the tanker trucks. Trimac is owned by Rentokil of the United Kingdom - they haul pesticides and chemicals for BASF, DuPont and Bayer. (See www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm).

* COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT ARE NOW BEING USED TO SPRAY - particularly BOEING planes. Also, an aircraft mechanic from a major airline received anonymous "warning" call, job suspension and threats left in his locker after his observing an extra 50gal. plus 2 smaller gal. tanks located near the aircraft waste disposal system. The extra tanks WERE NOT connected to the waste disposal system, but instead led to a box attached to the aircraft's central control and had piping leading to deliberately "hollowed out" wiring connected to the edges of the aircraft's wings. (See www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm).

* Also there are alot of anti-chemtrail activists reporting harrassment, but on 5/19/00 Cliff Carnicom, owner of the most proactive anti-chemtrail website, contacted the FBI regarding impersonation, libel, professional hacking and death threats. His site alone has submitted 3,087 letters to federal officials, and 828 letters to state officials and TO DATE NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN RECEIVED..

D. Announcements.

* Email Congressman Tom Udall. He told a constituent he would ask for Congressional hearings. Let's hold him up to that. tom.udall (at) mail.house.gov

* Nationwide organization "Citizens Against Chemtrails" is putting together a massive petition for Congressional hearing purposes. Submit your name/address/email at Cliff site: www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm, or email ohwarriorgoddess (at) earthlink.net

* Whistleblowers can do so anonymously at www.users.ev1.net/~seektress/tips.htm




SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE
www.sightings.com
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

FAQs



What are Contrails?

Streaks of condensed water vapor created in the air by jet airplanes at high altitudes. (Merriam-Websters)

Streamer of cloud sometimes observed behind an airplane flying in clear, cold, humid air. (Encyclopaedia Britannica)

A visible cloud streak, usually brilliantly white in color, which trails behind a missile or other vehicle in flight under certain conditions. (DOD Dictionary of Military Terms)

Contrails can exist in two forms: water droplet and ice crystal.

Under what conditions do Contrails form?

The primary factors in contrail formation are air temperature and moisture content. They are usually seen at the higher colder altidtudes, but will even occur at ground level in Antartica, sometimes causing a visibility problem for jets that take too long to take-off. Contrails started becoming a common sight during World War II, when bombers started flying at altitudes above 30,000 feet. They can exist in two forms: water and ice. A water droplet contrail occurs when an airplane flies though cold and supersaturated moist air and the warm water vapour produced by the engine condenses into tiny droplets. Under colder temperatures the water will freeze creating suspended ice-crystals.

The following graph represents contrail data collected for Houston, TX over several months. See the Trail Research Report for full details.



Temperature and Humidity (degrees of separation between Dew Point and Temperature).
Red points indicate longer relative contrail persistence, blue shorter persistence.




A Contrail forms upon condensation of water vapour produced by the combustion of fuel in the airplane engines. When the ambient relative humidity is high, the resulting water-droplet and/or ice-crystal plume may last for several hours. The trail may be distorted by the winds, etc. (Encyclopaedia Britannica)

What are Chemtrails?

Streaks of chemicals created in the air by spray systems on airplanes at any altitude. Chemicals are sprayed via planes for many purposes including crop dusting and mosquito control. Also fuel is sometimes dumped to reduce weight before landing. But within the Chemtrail observer community Chemtrails are the product of an active large scale operation.

Chemtrails are said to vary from contrails in their length of persistence.

See also.

What the hell is really going on?

Some people are reporting what they describe to be unusual activity in the sky, including jets leaving trails at low altitudes, spray lines creating X's, S's and parallel lines, lines that slowly spread to create a canopy of haze, and reports of unusual smells, tastes, and even illness related to the trails.

Also, a reddish-brown gel, dropped from low-flying aircraft, has been observed by people in the past and was even documented on Unsolved Mysteries. Samples of this substance have been alledgedly analyzed by Margareta-Erminia Cassani and found to be teaming with biological organisms.

What would be the purpose of releasing these chemicals or biological agents?

This must be decided by the reader for themselves.

There are currently three main hypothesis:

Weather Modification

Humans have had the ability to physically affect the weather since learning how to seed clouds in 1946, or possibly 1880. The popular conception of weather manipulation is limited to cloud seeding, but the possibility that the extents of our abilities may have progressed in the meantime is definitely plausible. The fact that the military is very interested in weather control is no secret and many propose that the Chemtrail Phenomena is a part of this. If true, what is the goal of the weather modification and what negative effects could it have on the environment? NASA is currently conducting several programs that are studying the effects of contrails on weather and the effects do not appear to be beneficial.

Population Control

The use of chemical and biological agents by a government against it's own people is, unfortunately, a historical fact. Even unintentional accidents can occur. But, some people suggest that Chemtrails could actually be part of a program to reduce the population and many feel Chemtrails have caused them to become ill and perhaps they are right. If the Chemtrails contain biological agents then people already weakened by other factors may have even died as a result of the additional strain on their systems, but could such a diabolical purpose be the ultimate goal? History has taught that even the most unconscionable schemes can be made into reality by men filled with fear and hate, and with such weapons in the hands of government we must remain vigilant until answers are forthcoming.

Inoculation Program

Chemical and biological weapons have been used for centuries but have recently entered the world stage as a primary threat. Biological agents have the ability to spread and multiply in casualties. These bioweapons are easy to produce and difficult, but possible, to defend against. The recent actions of the military to require anthrax vaccines for all service personnel show that this matter is of high importance. Some propose that the government may be quietly releasing bioagents to vaccinate citizens via the air. This could account for reported illnesses since a vaccine sometimes makes a person sick. Municipal water supplies might not be universal enough and could be easily sampled and tested, but everyone breathes the air. And the federal government rules the air.

Why would Chemtrails be created in the daytime where anyone could see?

Since spraying is being reported day and night, it may be a necessity of the magnitude of the operation. Also, if people noticed trails that only occurred under the cover of darkness they might be more inclined to become suspicious. But when unusual activity occurs in the sky during broad daylight it goes unnoticed because the human mind attempts to interpret things based on past experience, thus a Chemtrail would be just a Contrail to most. If they even bothered to look up and notice.

Why would Chemtrails be created in such noticeable patterns?

If jet planes are used to provide aerial spray coverage of a particular area, and the planes are leaving a trail, there are going to be unusual patterns in the sky. Again, the human oblivious factor comes in to play to lower the impact of the lines.

When did all this start?

Reports of Chemtrails began slowly gaining momentum in 1999, and are increasing rapidly in 2000. There are reports and photographic evidence to suggest that some spraying was occuring as early as 1990.

What evidence exists to support a Chemtrail operation?

No concrete proof exists and no govermental admissions have been issued for the Chemtrail operation. It has been openly admitted by the Pentagon that the U.S. military has performed many biological warfare tests on unknowing servicemen in the past, additionally the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post have even reported that civilians may have died as a result of exposure to live agents sprayed by the Army and Navy during biological warfare tests.

There are thousands of reports and hundreds of photos. You must decide for yourself what they amount to. Some people think it is just contrails, but many are saying that there is more, that something unusual is happening.

New research indicates that there may be a unique type of trail. Using atmospheric soundings and Flight Explorer, the trails over Houston, TX were observed, measured and analyzed. See the Trail Research Report for full details.



Houston, TX 1/20/01 5:57-6:07pm: Example Flight Explorer Display.
Red indicates greater than 27,000 ft, Orange are lower altitude, and Blue have landed.




What countries have reports of Chemtrails?

Who are the responsible parties?

The largest number of reports seems to be from the US, followed by Canada. Several other countries have some reports, often noted by western visitors. Since reports are coming from multiple countries, it seems to transcend individual governments. But with no obvious controlling body the answer remains to be seen.

Country United Nations NATO Member NATO Partner


United States yes yes
Canada yes yes
United Kingdom yes yes
France yes yes
Germany yes yes
Netherlands yes yes
Italy yes yes
Sweden yes no yes
Croatia yes no yes
Australia yes no no
Mexico yes no no
New Zealand yes no no
Haiti yes no no

If you have or know of any other web documented observations from other countries please submit them.

What is a Sunring, Chemring, Chembow?

What is a Sundog, Chemdog?

Why did I see two suns?

These effects are all caused by the refraction of light.

In meteorology, Halo is the name given to a ring of light surrounding the sun or moon. This effect is produced by light as it passes through ice crystals suspended in the air. A Sundog is an even more elusive natural phenomena, which, utilizes the hexagonal shape of the ice crystals along with a "prefered" horizontal orientation of the crystal's flat faces. The Sundog appears, as a bright spot of light, usually to the left or right of the Halo, while the sun is lower in the sky. A Sunring, Chemring, or Chembow is based on the same priciple but created in the haze of heavy daytime spraying instead of ice crystals. These chemical Sunrings are quite large, probably larger than the water based 22 degree rings. The ring can appear as a 360 degree muted rainbow under ideal conditions. Along the ring, a chemical Sundog, or Chemdog may occur. This has been described by some as "two suns". Also a Chemdog may be formed in the precipitation of particles from below a Chemtrail. In this case the full Sunring is not created, but the brighter Chemdog is seen.

What is an Iridescent Chembow?

Why did I see a rainbow in a cloud or Chemtrail?

This effect is caused by the diffraction of light.

This is caused by Cloud Iridescence which occurs when sunlight is diffracted by water droplets to create an irregular-shaped rainbow. This effect can also be seen lighting up Chemtrails with a bright blob of spectrum-colors.

The term Chembow is popularly used to apply to both the "bow" of the Sunring and the rainbow-colored patch of the Iridescence effect. Perhaps more correctly applied to the former, as it actually is a bow.

What is the deal with the black lines?

Dark lines or trails in the sky can be caused by a variety of things. Sometimes even normal contrails can appear dark due to lighting effects or excessive pollution. Many black lines are the result of a trail casting a shadow onto a canopy of haze below. It can have the appearance of proceeding the airplane if the sun is shining from behind. Cloud cutting, the process in which a plane flies through a layer of cirrus aviaticus can sometimes create channels which also appear dark.

What about the silver orbs?

A rare but documented phenomena, silver orbs, which are also described as white or nickle in color, have been observed in conjunction with spraying. They are reported to hover in the general area of Chemtrails and then leave. These may be advanced military drones involved with testing the components of the trails. Sighting locations include California, Texas and Alabama.







© Thermonuclear Productions, All Rights Reserved, 2002 A.D.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Dear Reader,

If you have a genuine interest in finding out if it is true that these so called "chemtrails" are real or just a bunch of "leftist propaganda" all you need to do is this. Go to the following site, and spend some time there. Splash around. Don't believe either of the points of view on this site. FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF! Think for yourself.

There is so much evidence on this site (as well as many others) proving the chemtrail operation that it's not even funny.

JUST DO IT! GO TO THIS SITE AND SEE FOR YOURSELF!!!


www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/hos.html
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Chickiedeb is a known debunker. The person (under various names) attacking the idea of chemtrails on this site is hereby totally exposed. Read all about "chickiedeb" here:

www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/debunking.html

eat it buddy.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Chickiedeb exposed, huh? by Julian Penrod?! You!are! as! pathetic! as he/she! for! copying! and! using! that! garbage!

cdebsjournal.topcities.com/leadpage.htm

Anyway, for your viewing enjoyment. and others who are clueless about aviation-

www.airliners.net/open.file/402824/M/

www.airliners.net/open.file/398904/M/

www.airliners.net/open.file/402623/M/

How's come ol' Willie Thomas removed this article, pre="chemtrail" from his website? That ol' Green Son of a Gun!

web.archive.org/web/20011219195053/http://www3.bc.sympatico.ca/Willthomas/invest/investjets.htm

4 years and counting and no tangible or verifiable proof. Ask Carnicom and his buddy Dave Peterson what happened to the public accounting of the "chemtrail fraud, er I mean fund" they collected. What did Lori Kramer do with the fund she collected beside get a new monitor?

And Kim Weber? She witnessed some real "911 chemtrails" made by F-16's patrolling my country when no other planes were flying. Remember that little incident back in 2001?

cdebsjournal.topcities.com/post911Satshots.htm

eat what, oh great exposer?
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

yeah sure, and no one is paying you to go from site to site and argue and try to confuse people about the issue.HA!

You seem both selective in your information, and cunningly knowlegeable about all kind of chemtrail researchers work, yet adamantly denying their existance. No one has time on their hands to waste these days, unless you are paid or have an agenda. It certainly isn't public service. Come on, admit it. You are paid by the fed to go from site to site and try to disuade people from seeing the truth. There will always be some angle to challange with. That's life.

Too bad for you some one is doing a photo essay on the planes and their routes and their type: military. You can rant and rave all you want. The truth is comming out and people are finding out.

later mole.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

A photo essay without tangible proof of what the photos are will mean jack, jack.

Paid to go site to site? How could I go site to site when I am banned from the chemtrail message boards and have been since 2000? The only board until recently where all debunkers were banned that I could post was Chemtrail Central. Sorry, chump, I will not admit to something that isn't true, unlike thou. If I were beind paid by anyone, why would I have a free website?

This messageboard happened to pop up on my website tracker when someone linked my website to your thread here.

Fri, 15 Aug, 17:34:50 santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/5210/index.php
Fri, 15 Aug, 18:07:44 santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/5210/index.php

I wouldn't read Indymedia.org -too looney, too liberal, too Green and too anti-American.

Ever hear about "the dumbing down of America?" Critical thinking was dropped from the public schools and one of the results are people who believe everything they read on the Internet. The planes you claim are "chemtrailing" are easily identitifed. If you knew how you can observe the weather at flying altitudes that cause persistent contrails. But why bother. It's easier to believe than to find the truth and e-d-u-c-a-t-e yourself.

Yeah, I have so much time on my hands that my website hasn't been updated since March. Your powers of observation are remarkable. Your "chemtrail truth" has been coming out for 4 years. Where you been?
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Until this winter I haven't been sick for years. I was even
incarcerated for six months without my supplements and didn't get sick.
That is until this winter. I was pretty sick for about a week. It happen
over Christmas after a small carbohydrate binge. Thought it was the
binge but could be wrong. I just don't know.

larry

shamayim wrote:
>
>

> > 2.29.00
> > Lab Analysis Of Chemtrails: Virulent Bio-Toxin Soup
> >
> >
> >
> > Those kind, peaceful, humanitarian Nazis in our beloved federal
> > government have now been proved to be engaged in dosing most of North
> > America (and who knows where else--probably everywhere) with
> > substances sprayed from military jets; substances which laboratory
> > analysis now confirms contain a horrendous, virulent and HIGHLY
> > infectious/contagious brew of a wide variety of diseases.
> >
> > The frighteningly long list of such includes some very severe bacterial
> > agents; toxic bacilli; mold and fungus spores, enzymes used in
> > recombinant DNA experimentation and Ethylene Dibromide--more commonly
> > known as jet fuel.
> >
> > Sound good? Wonder why everyone you ever knew and everyone THEY ever
> > knew seems to be sick this winter?
> >
> > Satanic feds, implementing some criminally psychopathic, Fourth Reich
> > agenda on behalf of their New World Order fuhrers, appear determined
> > to--shall we say--significantly reduce the functional human population
> > by such continual widespread aerial dosing of huge population groups.
> >
> > And guess what? They don't give a rat's butt whether you're white,
> > brown, black, pink, green, Native American, Christian, Muslim,
> > Buddhist or Jew. They want us dead. There can really be no other
> > conceivable explanation for what has become the most open secret of
> > the year 2000--namely, the continual bombardment of the population
> > with this incredibly severe soup of diseases and toxins which ARE
> > being dispersed by military aircraft all across North America.
> >
> > And as we've noted, the chances this is occurring elsewhere around the
> > world would seem extraordinarily high as well.
> >
> > So this is how they're doing it in the Fourth Reich. Hey, they don't
> > need concentration camps and ovens this time--too inefficient. And
> > also, it's bad for the public image and public relations. This way,
> > they can just deny, deny, deny and deny.... until EVERYBODY'S DEAD!
> > Except of course, those cyborgs (Al Gore, George Bush), quasi-cyborgs
> > robotons and genetically-desirable humans whom the world government
> > deems acceptable slaves and to whom they have provided the necessary
> antidotes.
> >
> >
> > The writer of the forwarded message below cites the applicable federal
> > "laws" (?!) which permit and "regulate" such widespread "testing" of
> > biological and chemical warfare agents on the American people. Well,
> > isn't that just the nicest thing.
> >
> > We know it's hard to believe, but the Department of Defense IS
> > AUTHORIZED to conduct biological and chemical warfare experiments us
> > any time and any place they choose; supposedly in accordance with a
> > couple of mindbendingly weak conditions.
> >
> > I mean, can you even BELIEVE this? Must be a bad dream, right? We WISH
> > it was, but no. It's for REAL.
> >
> >
> > Welcome to the FOURTH REICH, folks.
> >
> >
> >
> > NewsHawk® Inc.
> > - - - - - - - -
> > Subject: Chemtrail Info
> > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:35:37 -0800
> > From: Penny Jarvis <penny (at) kfalls.net>
> >
> >
> >> > They have to reduce the size of the human population by "humane means".
>This
> > got me to wondering if they thought that chemical spraying was in their
> > opinion a humane means to reduce the population.
> >
> > I don't know if you have heard of William Thomas, but he has a lot of
> > info on the chemtrails. His website is
> >www.willthomas.net or www.lifeboatnews.com

> >> >
> > The recently revised U.S. Code Title 50, Section 1520 states
> > that the Secretary of Defense may conduct tests or experiments
> > "involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian
> > population" if they are related to research activity. The law also
> > stipulates that biowarfare test can be carried out on Americans only if
> > congress is notified 30 days in advance, and "only if informed consent
> > to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the
> > testing on that subject.
> >
> > There is plenty of pattern and precedent to suggest that clandestine
> > biowarfare experiments are routinely pacticed on the American public
> > without their informed consent. Two Congressional investigations in
> > 1977 and 1994 - and recently declassified British defense documents -
> > detail 50 years of "open air" testing that used ships and spray-
> > equipped aircraft to spread biological warfare simulaants on hundreds
> > of cities across the U.S., Canada and the U.K. There is more to this
> > article. I just wanted to give you some of the info because I could
> > spend the rest of the day typing this stuff up.
> >
> >
> > So far some of the chemicals that were collected from the chemtrail
> > spray and lab tested is:
> > 1. Bacilli & Molds
> > 2. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
> > 3. Pseudomonas Florescens
> > 4. Bacilli Amyloliquefaciens
> > 5. Streptomyces
> > 6. Enterobacteriaceae
> > 7. Serratia Marcscens
> > 8. Human White Blood Cells
> > 9. A restricter enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA
> > 10. Enterobacter Cloacae
> > 11. Other bacilli and other toxic molds capable of producing heart
> > disease and meningitis, as well as acute upper respiratory and
> > gastrointestinal distress.
> > 12. JP-8 Jet Fuel = Ethylene Dibromide
> >
> > # 2. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa = Respiratory tract infection by the
> > ubiquitous bacterium. Cancer and burn patients also commonly suffer
> attack
> > from this organism. Unlike other bacteria that reside in the
>enviroment,
> > P. aeruginosa has a remarkable capacity to cause disease. Pseudomonas
>has
> > the ability to adapt and thrive in many ecological niches, including
> > humans. Once infections are established, P. aeruginosa produces a
>number
> > of toxic proteins which cause not only extensive tissue damage, but also
> > interfere with the human immune system's defense mechanisms. These
> > proteins range from potent toxins that enter and kill host cells at or
> near
> > the size of colonization to degradative enzymes that permantly disrupt
>the
> > cell membranes and connective tissues in various organs. P. aeruginosa
> > successfully colonizes the respiratory tract. One reason is that it
> > produces a highly protective capsule made of the mucoid polysaccharide
> > alginate. This allows the bacteria to resist engulfment by immune
>system
> > cells and better adhere to the lining of the lungs. It is likely that
> > antibiotics cannot effectively eradicate Pseudomonas from the lungs
> because
> > of this protective capsule. In addition, some Pseudomonas strains can
> > inactivate the drugs that threaten them by using enzymes to modify the
> drug.
> >
> > # 7. Serratia Marcescens is a significant opportunistic human bacterial
> > pathogen. This microorganism has been shown to be the cause of many
> > life-threatening diseases such as pneumonia, meningitis and
>endocarditis.
> > It is one of the major causes of hospital-acquired infections. The
> > seriousness of a S. marcescens infection is compounded by the fact that
>it
> > is very resistant to most commonly used antibotics, thus making
>treatment
> > difficult. In this study one of the factors contributing to the
> antibiotic
> > resistance of S. marcescens will be examined. In order for an
>antibiotic
> > to kill or inhibit growth of bacteria it must penetrate the outer
>surface
> > or membrane and enter the bacterial cell which is very difficult.
> >
> >
> > I hope some of this helps you to better understand what we are
> > fighting against.
> > Penny
> >
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

It's easier to believe than to find the truth and e-d-u-c-a-t-e yourself.

Note that the above you quoted does not provide the name or location of the supposed lab, therefore verification is not possible. Old news, same old BS, same old "Buy My Books and Videos because I am a washed-up EcoJournalist who can't get a real job" William (no Jets) Thomas rhetoric.

If something so dastardly was really happening, why has it taken 4 years to provide tangible proof? Don't you think in 4 years a few more citizns other than a handful of rag-tag Green-types would have noticed by now? Oh yeah, the chemmies are all enlightened and all of us others, includinding the hundreds of thousands of professional people in the aviation and science industries are sheep, or in your *mind* paid to say otherwise. People like William Thomas count on those who can't critically think to *accept* what he writes without question. You passed.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Hey Chickiedeb,

what exposes you is the obvious fact that no one in their right mind would cover up and defend a massive illegal operation with tens of thousands of highly credible eyewitnesses, and tons of documentation, UNLESS THEY WERE BEING PAID AND COMMISSIONED TO DO SO.

Honestly, why would you spend so much time going all over the internet, from site to site, trying to confuse people about the truth of the chemtrail operation, unless you were set up to do it.

YOU ARE TOTALLY EXPOSED AS A GOVERNMENT SHILL. Try to get a real life someday, cause all you are doing is trying to decieve people.

Clearly you have no interest in the truth.

For those inteligent people who DO want to know the truth, you can find out for yourself.

The government has a long proven history of spraying chemicals illegaly and unknowingly on the U.S. population. That PROOF is posted a couple of times on this site.

WHY WOULD THEY STOP NOW???

They wouldn't. They would naturally increase it.

Once anyone with an iota of intelligence sees the massive amount of documentation about the spray opereratioin that is happeneing all over the country, it becomes very obvious that the Chemtrail operation is real.

Paid disinfo people like "chickiedeb" only fool a few people for a short while. Intellegent people can quickly see through the disinfo (like who believes the lies and coverups that the media spews out? no one!) Similarly, the fed has allot at stake in keeping people unsure and confused about the fact that they are getting sprayed DAILY.

The unmarked white kc135 airforce tankers are flying daily, dozens of times daily, without exeption. The FAA denies that there are any commercial flights on that route. Yet the military spray planes are flying over Santa Cruz constantly!

Chickiedeb: nice try, but you long ago exposed yourself. Why are you so adamant that chemtrails are not real? what is your agenda? because you care about people? HA!

Folks, think for yourself. The truth is obvious once you open your eyes.

Chickiedeb is paid by the fed to confuse you. Don't buy it!
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Finally - A Chemtrail
Aerosol Breakthrough?
By Clifford E Carnicom
7-27-3


Note - We know Clifford Carnicom to be as fine a private sector citizen/patriot researcher as we have ever worked with. His numerous appearances on the program addressing and presenting his tireless efforts to scientifically resolve the chemtrail aerosol mystery are remarkable, graphic testimony to his studied, determined, methodical approach to unmasking this ongoing aerial operation. Therefore, we take seriously the following news release from Clifford.
The portion of the statement regarding a SARS '80% mortality rate' suggests an enthno-specific bioweapon aimed at the mainland Chinese Asian population. As we know, SARS and apparent mutations thereof, made their way to Canada (and the US) primarily via Asians who had been in - or had come into contact with people who had been in - the SARS hot zones in China and Hong Kong. In fact, the recent list of photos of SARS fatalities in Canada showed that the vast majority of victims were Asian in national origin. We are taking all of this under advisement with an open mind and will watch to see what kind of feedback and comments come in. -ed

A Meeting
By Clifford E Carnicom
7-26-3
A meeting has taken place recently between an investigative researcher and a well placed military source. The identity of both parties is to be protected. The source has intimate knowledge of at least one aspect of the aerosol operations, and asserts the following:
1. The operation is a joint project between the Pentagon and the pharmaceutical industry.
2. The Pentagon wishes to test biological diseases for war purposes on unsuspecting populations. It was stated that SARS is a failure as the expected rate of mortality was intended to be 80%.
3. The pharmaceutical industry is making trillions on medications designed to treat both fatal and non-fatal diseases given to populations.
4. The bacteria and viruses are freeze-dried and then placed on fine filaments for release.
5. The metals released along with the diseases heat up from the sun, creating a perfect environment for the bacteria and viruses to thrive in the air supply.
6. Most countries being sprayed are unaware of the activities and they have not consented to the activities. He states that commercial aircraft flying are one of the delivery systems.
7. Most of the "players" are old friends and business partners of the senior Bush.
8. The ultimate goal is the control of all populations through directed and accurate spraying of drugs, diseases, etc.
9. People who have tried to reveal the truth have been imprisoned and killed.
10. This is the most dangerous and dark time that I have experienced in all of my years of serving this country.
This information is relayed without qualification, as I am knowledgeable in the level of integrity of the researcher that has made this information available to the public. There is both risk and restraint that has been exercised in the preparation of this statement.
Clifford E Carnicom
Jul 26 2003
www.carnicom.com/meeting.htm

Comment
From Marjorie Tietjen
7-28-3
Jeff,
I agree with Dianne Harvey. I certainly believe there is biological experimentation taking place on the public without our consent. However, it seems to me that, as Dianne says , spraying entire countries with biological warfare agents...whether to just test the substances or whether it's to specifially harm us....is not a very direct or sure way of accomplishing their supposed goal. Vaccines, flouride in the water supply, infecting ticks and mosquitoes with genetically engineered viruses and bacteria, etc, would seem to be more effective in targeting certain portions of the population. Unless the "elite" all live underground, they would also be affected by mass aerial spraying. Clifford's explanation may be part of the picture but I really don't believe it explains the main purpose of chemtrails. I suppose TPTB could concievably be vaccinated for all these different microbes....but what about all the metallic particles, polymers, barium, etc?
Marge Tietjen
Comment
From CM Ross
7-28-3
Dear Jeff,
Thank you for your courageous work in exposing the truth about chemtrails.
I am in complete agreement with you and complete disagreement with Diane Harvey on the subject of why chemtrails exist. Having studied population control issues for 11 years now, I think that there is a commitment by international leadership to dramatically lower the population by whatever means at their disposal. Fluoride, abortion, aspartame, birth control, vaccines, etc. are not enough. Former US Secretary of State Robert Mcnamara said as much in an explosive interview in "Paris Match" several years ago. Here is another of his quotes on it from 1979:
"There are only 2 possible ways a world of 10 Billion people can be averted. Either the current Birth rates must come down more quickly or current death rates must go up. There is no other way. There are of course many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, Wars can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature's ancient check on population growth and neither one has disappeared from the scene. To put it simply: Excessive population growth is the greatest obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most societies of the developing world." [emphasis added] (Robert Mcnamara, October 2, 1979). www.africa2000.com/INDX/tukur.html
It is too bad that Mcnamara did not notice that the densest part of the USA is Manhattan at rush hour, where the people are, for the most part, rich and well-fed; and that New Jersey, which is much more densely populated than Red China, also has a much higher income than Red China. My point: it's having more people that makes a wealthier population, not fewer of them.
At any rate:
For more evidence of plans to greatly reduce the population by disease, see:
www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians1.htm and
www.radioliberty.com/pca.htm
Consider this quote:
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation" HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh at a lecture in 1986
www.propagandamatrix.com/prince.html
When the husband of a reigning sovereign is permitted to make remarks of this sort and is not shouted down for them, it makes you wonder if there is more to chemtrails and the strange deaths of microbiologists like David Kelly than meets the eye.
This article at www.mercola.com/2001/sep/8/mycoplasma.htm demonstrates that the Canadian Government tested the dropping of carcinogens on the people of Winnipeg, Manitoba in 1953. As far as I know, the people of Winnipeg were not consulted as to whether or not they wished to be human guinea pigs for the experiment. This article mentions that the subways of New York were tested, too:
gslc.genetics.utah.edu/features/biowarfare/
Can you imagine the government telling the people of New York: "Oh Hi folks, we're going to do a few little harmless biowarfare tests on you. Nothing to worry about, you understand." I don't think so. And the same holds true for chemtrails.
As for the notion that they are not targeting the Asian race, I am sure they are. Birth control was originally known as race control. Obviously, birth control and abortion have not worked as well as they had hoped in China and the rest of the world, or else AIDS would not be decimating Africa, now would it?
Keep up the good work,
Miss CM Ross
Comment
From Linda Porter
7-29-3
Jeff, this story is correct.
Remember when I emailed you about 3 years ago with the accounts of my MILAB experience, and the story the eight military men had told me about chemtrail consisting of designer bacteria developed to decimate segments of certain races?
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

To the debunkers

Chemtrails outlaw
The government says they don’t exist, but Kucinich wants Congress to take action

by Bob Fitrakis

The debate surrounding the federal government’s alleged weather modification experiments has landed in the U.S. Capitol, thanks to Cleveland Democrat Dennis Kucinich. Representative Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 on October 2 last year, seeking a “permanent ban on [the] basing of weapons in space.?

The bill, HR 2977, specifically outlaws a variety of weapons detailed in the December 6, 2001, Columbus Alive article “Stormy Weather,? which exposed allegations of secret government aerial spraying activities. Kucinich’s bill explicitly outlaws “chemtrails.?

Alive asked Kucinich why he would introduce a bill banning so-called chemtrails when the U.S. government routinely denies such things exist and the U.S. Air Force has routinely called chemtrail sightings “a hoax.?

“The truth is there’s an entire program in the Department of Defense, ‘Vision for 2020,’ that’s developing these weapons,? Kucinich responded. Kucinich says he plans to reintroduce a broader version of the bill later this month. “Plasma, electromagnetics, sonic or ultrasonic weapons [and] laser weapons systems? were among those banned by HR 2977.

Two scientists working at Wright Patterson Air Force Base informed Alive of the ongoing secret experiments, one involving weather modification and the other involving the creation of an aerial antenna using a barium stearate chemical trail. The scientists referred to the work of legendary inventor Nikola Tesla. Before Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars?), there was Tesla’s vision of high-tech space-based warfare and weather modification.

According to Tesla biographer Margaret Cheney, federal agents seized Tesla’s papers after his death in 1943. “[At] least one set of Tesla’s papers had reached Wright Field [now Wright Patterson Air Force Base],? Cheney wrote. The Aeronautic Systems Division at Wright Patterson admitted it had the Tesla papers but claim they were “destroyed.?

However, Tesla’s dream is embodied in a glossy brochure titled “Vision for 2020? released by the U.S. Space Command in 1998. The brochure states, “The emerging synergy of space superiority with land, sea and air superiority will lead to Full Spectrum Dominance.?

The Space Command spells out its purpose pretty plainly: “Dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect U.S. interests and investment.?

There’s nothing new here, for those who have been paying attention. In the 1970s, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, bluntly stated in his book Between Two Ages, “Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need to be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.?

On January 4 this year, Canadian Professor Michel Chossudovsky, of the Center for Research on Globalization at the University of Ottawa, issued a report noting that weapons have the ability to trigger climate changes. “Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the world’s climate. In the U.S., the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),? Chossudovsky wrote. “Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction.?

Doubters of the military’s secret plans should refer to George and Meredith Friedman’s The Future of War, Power, Technology and American World Dominance in the 21st Century. The Friedmans, government-touted “arms experts? and favorites of the military-industrial complex, assert that “The American experience of power will rest on the domination of space.?

The U.S. Air Force giddily embraced the Friedmans’ thesis in the 1996 report “New World Vistas: Air And Space Power For The 21st Century.? The Air Force report notes, “In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict.?

State University of New York Professor of Journalism Karl Grossman, writing in 1999, revealed how the mainstream corporate press virtually ignores the government’s pronouncements while trade journals like Space News, Defense News, Aviation Week, Space Technology and Electronic Engineering Times routinely report on the military-industrial complex’s high-tech breakthroughs.

As for chemtrail skeptics, they might want to consult Rutgers University Political Science Professor Leonard Cole’s book Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Test Over Populated Areas. Chemtrail deniers are apparently happy with the thought that their beloved paternalistic government would engage in aerial spraying over densely populated areas.

U.S. Representative Marty Sabo, a Democrat from Minnesota, denounced “the secret Army program to spray Minneapolis and other cities with chemicals in the 1950s and ’60s,? the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported in September 1994. “The idea that the government would use its own citizens as guinea pigs is appalling, and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms,? Sabo told a House subcommittee investigating the secret spraying, which used fluorescent tracers to mark wind patterns.

As for the Army, it argues that the secret Cold War-era spraying was not “human experimentation? since it didn’t target any specific individuals and the zinc cadmium sulfide used was harmless. But the International Agency for Research on Cancer lists all cadmium compounds as known cancer-causing agents.

Former students of Clinton Elementary in south Minneapolis told an investigating panel from the National Research Council that the Army’s secret chemical spraying adversely affected their health, according to the Star Tribune.

Skeptics who continue to insist the government would never be involved in secret aerial spraying, particularly in Ohio, may want to address their questions to the C-130 aircrews from the 910th Airlift Wing stationed at Youngstown’s Air Reserve Station. In July 2000, an Air Force press release bragged, “Fifteen service members from military installations in Germany and England were at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, 8-12 May, learning how to use chemicals to destroy the enemy… The seven airmen and eight soldiers learned how to plan, execute and oversee the entire process of applying pesticides by air.? The press release said the Youngstown air unit will only be used against “insects with their deadly diseases.?

Apparently insects take many forms. During the Seattle demonstrations against the World Trade Organization in November 1999, CNN reported that a military air unit with pathogen capacity to induce sickness in humans was deployed against the demonstrators.

January 24, 2002

Note: They are real, very real. I have seen them since moving her in 1998. Debunker=sheeple
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Heavy Chemtrails Over
Indianapolis On 9-12 - But
No Commercial Planes Aloft!
9-13-1

Note - We've received several similiar reports of overnight chemtrail spraying from residents of Houston. -ed

From Don Hart
9-13-1

I live in Indianapolis and when I went outside to go to work Wednesday morning I look up, as I usually do, but this time thinking there would be NO Chemtrails because for the first time none of the 4,000 daily flights would be up there.

I was absolutely floored when most of the sky was covered with Chemtrails. I know the characteristic tendrils and patterns of Chemtrails and these were them! They also were about 3-4 hours old for the most part because I also know how long Chemtrails take to reach certain stages of spreading. If you ever needed proof for government planes causing the Chemtrails, this is it!

It was impossible for these to be contrails from commercial planes ... because there were zero commercial planes in the air. None. They must have felt the need to spray during the night, because people would have been alarmed if they saw aircraft flying when all flights were grounded. People might think they are terrorists (not far from true) and bring much attention to them.

It's ironic that bin Laden would be the one to provide positive proof of spraying for you and put an end to it through your efforts armed with this absolute truth. So, please hurry to close this chapter out!

Donald Hart
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

>>"YOU ARE TOTALLY EXPOSED AS A GOVERNMENT SHILL. Try to get a real life someday, cause all you are doing is trying to decieve people."<<

Yeah, you're right, pinhead. The "tens of thousands of eyewitnesses" that you imagaine are just as ignorant as you. Have a happy chemtrail day! I have no time for wasteproducts like you.
Be sure you vote in the Democratic primary and get Kucinich the nomination for president, even though he long ago abandoned "chemtrails" in HR2977. The Dems need Kucinich! and people like you are scary sons of a bitches. tata.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Everyone knows that Dennis Kucinich dropped the Chemtrail issue from his campaign because it is a hot topic, NOT because he is not behind stopping them anymore...HE IS. And he was asked at the event at the Vet's Hall (as well as another much more massive event in the Bay Area) about Chemtrails, and BOTH times he acknowledged the reality of Chemtrails.

It's idiotic government shills like "chickiedeb" who don't have a life so they have to sell their soul loud mouthing disinfo all around who are the dimwits here.

Hey Chickie: I hope you mean what you say that you "have no time for wasteproducts like us"...actually, it seems like you have lots of time for us. It seems like you have tons of time to scour the internet and disinfo on dozens of sites.

This Chickiepoo is well known for going site to site, and spewing lies and disinfo!


COME ON, YOU KNOW YOU HAVE LOTS OF TIME FOR US, AND THE MANY OTHER GREAT SIGHTS OUT THERE THAT ARE EXPOSING THIS HIDEOUS CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, AS YOU GET PAID TO DO THAT!!!

Put your money where your chicken mouth is: if you really don't have time for this...prove it!

See ya, chicken brains.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

it's so obvious this chickie is a joke. why would someone be so adamant against something real unless they were total idiots, or it was their job to do that. in this case it's probably both.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

As far as I can see, this whole issue is basically brought up by one guy, who never leaves his name (he changes tags from time to time). And if it is who I think it is, then he is the only guy who brings it up in any public meetings, and he usually does it by taking over the microphone and bringing this topic up, even if it is nothing close to what is being discussed. Hey, if he wants to sit there and be paranoid, and then call everyone who doesn't believe him an idiot and part of the mindless people, that's fine for him. As far as I'm concerned, he's living a life of unnecessary paranoia and fear, so that's fine with me. People shouldn't get so upset about this issue- either you believe they (chemtrails) exist or you don't-- you'll never be able to convince one side or the other to switch. However, I think it is interesting that this guy and others like him in the country have apparently done nothing but cook up "facts" and "evidence", and then periodically taken over sites like this for their purposes, but haven't actually done anything. Just a thought. Oh, and you can feel free to insult me, call me stupid, and exposed ass, whatever. "Sticks and stones...".
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

hi jerry. thanks for the post. here is a response. it may be true that people can't be swayed either way, and the point is to educate, and let people come to their own conclusions. there are allot of people who just don't know.

as far as going to meeings and "taking over the microphone" etc, when the topic is something else, that simply is completely untrue. There might have been one instance when there was a specific topic, and i brought up chemtrails, but in that meeting there were several other "non related" issues brought up by others as well.

As far as what you said "people shouldn't get so upset about the issue" that is simply rediculous!
Let people decide for themselves what they should get upset about! People were certainly upset that they wanted to flouridate our water, spray poison weed killers on our roads, and many other things.

Getting "upset" about being relentlessly sprayed with unknown chemicals by white unmarked kc135 airforce tankers day in and day out is a normal and healthy reaction.

Being aware of injustice and exposing it is not "paranoia", jerry. No one has "cooked up" evidence here! The evidence is all over the place! Thousands of people are aware of the situation, judging from the vast amount of documentation and personal testamonial from all kinds of folks (right, left, and everyone in between including doctors and researchers, and other health care practioners) from all over the country and Canada and beyond. Are you going to just summerily dismiss all these peoples experiences, videos, photographs, and eye witness accounts, just because it doesn't fit comfortably into your belief system? What do they call that? (comfortably numb)!!

As far as people "taking over sites", that is rediculous. no one has taken over this site!

As far as not doing anything about it, how do you know what is being done about it?

Your comments are welcome of course, and I encourage you to LOOK UP and familiarize yourself with the difference between a normal jet contrail (which dissolves within minutes and are never seen in criss cross or lined patterns that last for hours) and Chemtrails (which DO last for hours and slowly dissolve, eventually looking like clouds, then a white mist).

If you do, one day you will realize that this is not only not "paranoia" but it is so obvious, it isn't even funny!

You see, they slowly have conditioned the population to accept the chemtrails, and think they are normal. They are not. If you take the time to educate yourself, and if you look up, you will notice them.

When you do, let us know. Until then...take care.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Feature Story - The Chemtrail Smoking Gun - Proof of Global Geoengineering Projects
illustration - by Bruce Conway / revised 6.20.03 / Lightwatcher Publishing

forward: For the past few years investigators and researchers have been searching for hard evidence on the elusive phenomena of chemtrail spraying. If one searches GoogleNews for articles on chemtrails in (with 4500 periodicals represented) not one article will be found. There is simply no coverage on this topic in the mainstream media.

Imagine our surprise when we discovered extensive proof of government involvement, funding, sponsorship, multidisciplinary research, policy making and implementation of global atmospheric modification under the classification of 'Geoengineering.' This is the chemtrail smoking gun we have been looking for.

Authorized by Congress and sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, a monumental and in-depth study on global warming and possible corrective measures (mitigations) was undertaken in the early 1990s. Represented were senior researchers, faculty, theoreticians, atmospheric scientists, department heads and CEO's from a multitude of prestigious institutions. The Smithsonian, Harvard, General Motors, Cambridge, MIT, Yale, World Resources Institute, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Secretary General of the United Nations, Oxford, Brookings Institution, Columbia University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carnegie-Mellon University, Princeton University, Brown University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, and many more. This colossal study recalls the scope, expense and secrecy of the Manhattan Project, yet the goals and eventual impacts of it are far greater.


The Chemtrail Smoking Gun
Proof of global atmospheric geoengineering
by: Bruce Conway

"There are more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt in your philosophy." - Shakespeare

Five years ago I founded the Chemtrails Hall of Shame web site to document and investigate the elusive Chemtrail spraying operations in the skies above my home in the Pacific NW. The site can be found at: www.lightwatcher.com
During this time I have had the opportunity to work with and befriend several of the luminaries within this field of investigation: Diane Harvey, Brian Holmes and a very special investigator who chooses to remain anonymous in this article. Each of these individuals has contributed greatly to the subject, keeping this topic alive within the alternative media . These chemtrail spraying programs, which are apparently being conducted on a worldwide basis, are evident to anyone who has the desire to look up and perceive the evidence. Yet, definitive proof has remained elusive.

Total denial by governmental authorities, the shunning of this topic by mainstream media, the systematic discreditation of researchers, ongoing coverups by the scientific establishment, and a coordinated systematic policy of disinformation has relegated this topic to the realm of fantasy and paranoid delusion. Regardless, it continues to go on above our heads, and has now grown to become the largest coordinated global engineering project in the history of our species. How can I make such a preposterous claim?

Brian Holmes of www.holmestead.ca has investigated these eco-crimes for the past several years. Because of his efforts, many within Canada and on the net have become aware of the ongoing spraying operations. Like other serious investigators who have studied this phenomena, Brian's work has been maligned, and there are ongoing attempts to discredit him and his sources.

Some months ago, a Chemtrail insider that Brian nicknamed 'Deep Shield' came forward with specific and detailed information about this mysterious program, corresponding with him via e-mail. A transcript of the communications with Deep Shield and the Shield Project can be read online at: www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/shieldproject.html. For those of us who have studied chemtrails carefully, the revealing dialog rang of the truth.

Since then we have been able to study, and verify a number of Deep Shield's primary claims. The anonymous insider gave Brian's readers some valuable clues to follow if they wished to investigate deeper into the history and hard science of chemtrails. A primary clue was to investigate the term 'geoengineering.'

One investigator took the clues provided by 'Deep Shield' and dug in. She eventually found an N.A.S. study on Geoengineering and the Mitigation of Global Warming. This study is still available online and is also available in hardcover. This massive document validates the insider information provided by Deep Shield, and has lead to an additional gold mine of evidence.

This massive research study is entitled: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The results were presented in 1992 and published in book form in 2000 by the National Academy Press. This 994 page study is the textbook on greenhouse gasses, global warming, policy decisions and mitigation's (corrective measures). Included within is the hard science many chemtrails researchers have been searching for: the scientists, agencies, institutions and corporations involved, cost factors, chemical formula, mathematical modeling, delivery methods, policies, recruiting of foreign governments, acquisition of materials, and the manufacturing of aerosol compounds, ect.

This entire volume can presently be read online at: books.nap.edu/books/0309043867/html/index.html. Keep in mind that this study is only the tip of the iceberg. Literally hundreds of papers on related topics have been published in scientific journals. We don't expect this featured study to remian online for long once the cat is out of the bag. So do check it out soon.

The full involvement of foremost government agencies, research firms, universities and private corporations are detailed in this global 'geoengineering' study. Keep in mind that this was approved by and funded by Congress. We expect that this documentation will bolster the beliefs of most hardcore chemtrail believers. It will also continue to undermining what little trust still remains in our leaders and their institutions. This documentation proves that they have lied repeatedly about their involvement and the existence of chemtrail spraying programs.

It alsp appears that we 'Chemtrail' investigators have been chasing our tails, being intentionally discredited, maligned, and fed disinformation to keep the actual truth just below the levels of media perception. The real story has been taking place in broad daylight, safely concealed under the scientific umbrella of 'Geoengineering and intentional climate change.'

Chemtrails are just one of the 'mitigations' proposed to Geoengineering our planet. Once we began sifting through the numerous studies, experiments and papers written on intentional climate change, we found a wealth of supporting evidence of well funded global atmospheric modification programs. One such paper is Geoengineering: A Climate Change Manhattan Project www.metatronics.net/lit/geo2.html (Jay Michaelson, published in the Stanford Environmental Law Journal, January, 1998)

The author makes a very convincing case for the pressing need of undertaking geoengineering projects. He argues that regulation, environmental laws and other stumbling blocks limit our ability to directly address the dangers that threaten us directly and immediately. He writes: "The projected insufficiency of Kyoto's emission reduction regime, and the problems of absence, cost, and incentives discussed in part II, cry out for an alternative to our present state of climate change policy myopia."

"Geoengineering--intentional, human-directed manipulation of the Earth's climatic systems--may be such an alternative. This part proposes that, unlike a regulatory "Marshall Plan" of costly emissions reductions, technology subsidies, and other mitigation measures, a non-regulatory "Manhattan Project" geared toward developing feasible geoengineering remedies for climate change can meaningfully close the gaps in global warming and avert many of its most dire consequences."

"In some ways, this phase has already begun, as geoengineering has moved from the pages of science fiction to respectable scientific and policy journals. [FN127] One of the most encouraging proposals today focuses on the creation of vast carbon sinks by artificially stimulating phytoplankton growth with iron "fertilizer" in parts of the Earth's oceans. [FN128] Another proposal suggests creating miniature, *106 artificial "Mount Pinatubos" by allowing airplanes to release dust particles into the upper atmosphere, simulating the greenhouse- arresting eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991. [FN129]" pp. 105-106, Geoengineering: A Climate Change Manhattan Project."

In Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Bases conclusion, the N.A.S. found that the most effective global warming mitigation turned out to be the spraying of reflective aerosol compounds into the atmosphere utilizing commercial, military and private aircraft. This preferred mitigation method is designed to create a global atmospheric shield which would increase the planet's albedo (reflectivity) using aerosol compounds of aluminum and barium oxides, and to introduce ozone generating chemicals into the atmosphere.

This method was the most cost effective, and yielded the largest benefits. It could also be conducted covertly to avoid the burdens of environmental protection and regulatory entanglements.

It is evident to anyone who cares to look up, that this mitigation is now being conducted worldwide and on a daily basis. It is certain that our leaders have already embarked on an immense geoengineering project; one in which they expect millions of human fatalities, and consider these to be acceptable losses.

This landmark study; the widespread experimentation and published papers of atmospheric theorists and scientists, combined with the visual evidence that atmospheric mitigations are being conducted in our skies, clearly shows that Chemtrail spraying has became a preferred solution to global warming mitigation.

The evidence is all around us. For example; this past week Boeing Aircraft received an enormous initial order from the Pentagon for 100 Boeing 767 tanker planes, to begin replacing the Air Force's aging fleet of KC-135s, the most commonly seen chemtrail spray plane. The final order will exceed 500 planes. There has been no mention of the usage of these aircraft.

Geoengineering is being carried on Earth on a staggering scale, without the impediment of environmental laws or regulatory constraints. This grand experiment is being conducted in full view, while being concealed in plain sight.

____________________________________________________________________________

The following excerpts detail the preferred geoengineering Mitigations for reducing greenhouse gasses, global warming and radiation from space. Quoted from: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming



Evaluating Geoengineering Options
"Several geoengineering options appear to have considerable potential for offsetting global warming and are much less expensive than other options being considered. Because these options have the potential to affect the radiative forcing of the planet, because some of them cause or alter a variety of chemical reactions in the atmosphere, and because the climate system is poorly understood, such options must be considered extremely carefully. These options might be needed if greenhouse warming occurs, climate sensitivity is at the high end of the range considered in this report, and other efforts to restrain greenhouse gas emissions fail."

"The first set of geoengineering options screens incoming solar radiation with dust or soot in orbit about the earth or in the atmosphere. The second set changes cloud abundance by increasing cloud condensation nuclei through carefully controlled emissions of particulate matter."

"The stratospheric particle options should be pursued only under extreme conditions or if additional research and development removes the concern about these problems. The cloud stimulation option should be examined further and could be pursued if concerns about acid rain could be managed through the choice of materials for cloud condensation nuclei or by careful management of the system. The third class increases ocean absorption of CO2 through stimulating growth of biological organisms."

Screening Out Some Sunlight
"Another option for mitigating a global warming would be to try to control the global radiation balance by limiting the amount of incoming radiation from the sun. This could be done by increasing the reflectivity of the earth, i.e., the albedo. Proposals for increasing the whiteness of roofs and surface features would have some effect, but only a fraction of incident solar radiation reaches the earth's surface and a purposeful change in albedo would have more impact if done high in the atmosphere. According to Ramanathan (1988), an increase in planetary albedo of just 0.5 percent is sufficient to halve the effect of a CO2 doubling. Placing a screen in the atmosphere or low earth orbit could take several forms: it could involve changing the quantity or character of cloud cover, it could take the form of a continuous sheet, or it could be divided into many ''mirrors" or a cloud of dust. Preliminary characterizations of some of the possibilities that might be considered are provided below."


Stratospheric Dust
"Although the space dust option does not appear to be sensible, computations of the residence times of 0.2-µm dust above 20 to 40 km are of the order of 1 to 3 years (Hunten, 1975). It seems to be generally accepted that volcanic aerosols remain in the stratosphere for several years (Kellogg and Schneider, 1974; Ramaswamy and Kiehl, 1985). A screen could be created in the stratosphere by adding more dust to the natural stratospheric dust to increase its net reflection of sunlight."

Mass Estimates
"Ramaswamy and Kiehl (1985) estimate that an aerosol dust loading of 0.2 g/m2 for dust with a radius of about 0.26 µm increases the planetary albedo by 12 percent, resulting in a 15 percent decrease of solar flux reaching the surface. Since an approximately 1 percent change in solar flux is required, and their Figures 13 and 15 suggest that, at these loadings, the dust effects may reasonably be extrapolated downward linearly, estimates will be made by using a dust loading of 0.02 g/m2 with a particle radius of 0.26 µm."

"The dust in Ramaswamy and Kiehl's model is distributed between 10 and 30 km in the stratosphere, uniformly over the globe. The actual effect on radiative forcing of a global distribution of additional dust would be somewhat greater at low than at high latitudes because more of the sunlight is effective there for geometric reasons. This would decrease slightly the equator-to-pole temperature gradients and might have some effect on weather intensity. Presumably, this effect can also be studied with global climate models."

Delivery Scenarios
"Aircraft Exhaust Penner et al. (1984) suggested that emissions of 1 percent of the fuel mass of the commercial aviation fleet as particulates, between 40,000- and 100,000-foot (12- to 30-km) altitude for a 10-year period, would change the planetary albedo sufficiently to neutralize the effects of an equivalent doubling of CO2. They proposed that retuning the engine combustion systems to burn rich during the high-altitude portion of commercial flights could be done with negligible efficiency loss. Using Reck's estimates of extinction coefficients for particulates (Reck, 1979a, 1984), they estimated a requirement of about 1.168 ¥ 1010 kg of particulates, compared with the panel's estimate of 1010 kg, based upon Ramaswamy and Kiehl (1985). They then estimated that if 1 percent of the fuel of aircraft flying above 30,000 feet is emitted as soot, over a 10-year period the required mass of particulate material would be emitted.
However, current commercial aircraft fleets seldom operate above 40,000 feet (12 km), and the lifetimes of particles at the operating altitudes will be much shorter than 10 years."

"An alternate possibility is simply to lease commercial aircraft to carry dust to their maximum flight altitude, where they would distribute it. To make a cost estimate, a simple assumption is made that the same amount of dust assumed above for the stratosphere would work for the tropopause (the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere). The results can be scaled for other amounts. The comments made above about the possible effect of dust on stratospheric ozone apply as well to ozone in the low stratosphere, but not in the troposphere. The altitude of the tropopause varies with latitude and season of the year."

"In 1987, domestic airlines flew 4,339 million ton-miles of freight and express, for a total express and freight operating revenue of $4,904 million (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1988). This gives a cost of slightly more than $1 per ton-mile for freight. If a dust distribution mission requires the equivalent of a 500-mile flight (about 1.5 hours), the delivery cost for dust is $500/t, and ignoring the difference between English and metric tons, a cost of $0.50/kg of dust. If 1010 kg must be delivered each 83 days, (provided dust falls out at the same rate as soot), 5 times more than the 1987 total ton-miles will be required."

"The question of whether dedicated aircraft could fly longer distances at the same effective rate should be investigated."

Changing Cloud Abundance - The Approach
"Independent studies estimated that an approximately 4 percent increase in the coverage of marine stratocumulus clouds would be sufficient to offset CO2 doubling (Reck, 1978; Randall et al., 1984). Albrecht (1989) suggests that the average low-cloud reflectivity could be increased if the abundance of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) increased due to emissions of SO2. It is proposed that CCN emissions should be released over the oceans, that the release should produce an increase in the stratocumulus cloud albedo only, and that the clouds should remain at the same latitudes over the ocean where the surface albedo is relatively constant and small."

"Albrecht (1989) estimates that a roughly 30 percent increase in CCN would be necessary to increase the fractional cloudiness or albedo of marine stratocumulus clouds by 4 percent. Albrecht's idealized stratocumulus cloud, which he argues is typical, has a thickness of 375 m, a drizzle rate of 1 mm per day, and a mean droplet radius of 100 mm, and he assumes that each droplet is formed by the coalescence of 1000 smaller droplets. The rate at which the CCN are depleted by his model is 1000/cm3 per day. Consequently, about 300/cm3 per day (30 percent of 1000) of additional CCN would have to be discharged per day at the base of the cloud to maintain a 4 percent increase in cloudiness. This assumes that the perturbed atmosphere would also remain sufficiently close to saturation in the vicinity of the CCN that additional cloud cover would be formed every time the number of CCN increased."

Mass Estimates of Cloud Condensation Nuclei
"With Albrecht's assumption in mind that cloudiness in a typical ocean region is limited by the small number of CCN, we now extrapolate to the entire globe. On the average, 31.2 percent of the globe is covered by marine stratiform clouds (Charlson et al., 1987). If no high-level clouds are present, the number n of CCN that need to be added per day is 1.8 ¥ 1025 CCN/day. The mass of a CCN is equal to 4/3pr3 ¥ density, and it is assumed that the mean radius r is equal to 0.07 ¥ 10-4 cm (Charlson et al., 1987). Because the density of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is 1.841 g/cm3, the CCN mass is 2.7 ¥ 10-15 g. The total weight of H2SO4 to be added per day is 31 ¥ 103 t per day SO2 if all SO2 is converted to H2SO4 CCN.
To put this number in perspective, a medium-sized coal-fired U.S. power plant emits about this much SO2 in a year. Consequently, the equivalent emissions of 365 U.S. coal-burning power plants, distributed homogeneously, would be needed to produce sufficient CCN."

"Cloud stimulation by provision of cloud condensation nuclei appears to be a feasible and low-cost option capable of being used to mitigate any quantity of CO2 equivalent per year. Details of the cloud physics, verification of the amount of CCN to be added for a particular degree of mitigation, and the possible acid rain or other effects of adding CCN over the oceans need to be investigated before such system is put to use. Once a decision has been made, the system could be mobilized and begin to operate in a year or so, and mitigation effects would be immediate. If the system were stopped, the mitigation effect would presumably cease very rapidly, within days or weeks, as extra CCN were removed by rain and drizzle."

"Several schemes depend on the effect of additional dust compounds in the stratosphere or very low stratosphere screening out sunlight. Such dust might be delivered to the stratosphere by various means, including being fired with large rifles or rockets or being lifted by hydrogen or hot-air balloons. These possibilities appear feasible, economical, and capable of mitigating the effect of as much CO2 equivalent per year as we care to pay for. (Lifting dust, or soot, to the tropopause or the low stratosphere with aircraft may be limited, at low cost, to the mitigation of 8 to 80 Gt CO2 equivalent per year.) Such systems could probably be put into full effect within a year or two of a decision to do so, and mitigation effects would begin immediately. Because dust falls out naturally, if the delivery of dust were stopped, mitigation effects would cease within about 6 months for dust (or soot) delivered to the tropopause and within a couple of years for dust delivered to the midstratosphere."

"Sunlight screening systems would not have to be put into practice until shortly before they were needed for mitigation, although research to understand their effects, as well as design and engineering work, should be done now so that it will be known whether these technologies are available if wanted."

"Perhaps one of the surprises of this analysis is the relatively low costs at which some of the geoengineering options might be implemented."

(end of excerpts)
__________________________________________________________

Following is a partial list of those involved in this monumental study:

(former Senator) DANIEL J. EVANS
(Chairman), Chairman, Daniel J. Evans & Associates, Seattle, Washington

ROBERT McCORMICK ADAMS, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

GEORGE F. CARRIER, T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Applied Mathematics, Emeritus, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

RICHARD N. COOPER, Professor of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

ROBERT A. FROSCH, Vice President, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan

THOMAS H. LEE, Professor Emeritus, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

JESSICA TUCHMAN MATHEWS, Vice President, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.

WILLIAM D. NORDHAUS, Professor of Economics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

GORDON H. ORIANS, Professor of Zoology and Director of the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Washington, Seattle

STEPHEN H. SCHNEIDER, Head, Interdisciplinary Climate Systems, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

MAURICE STRONG, Secretary General, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, New York (resigned from panel February 1990)

SIR CRISPIN TICKELL, Warden, Green College, Oxford, England
VICTORIA J. TSCHINKEL, Senior Consultant, Landers, Parsons and Uhlfelder, Tallahassee, Florida

PAUL E. WAGGONER, Distinguished Scientist, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven

PETER BREWER, Executive Director, Monterey Bay Aquarium and Research Center, Pacific Grove, California

RICHARD N. COOPER, Professor of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

ROBERT CRANDALL, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

ROBERT EVENSON, Professor of Economics, Yale University, Economic Growth Center, New Haven, Connecticut

DOUGLAS FOY, Executive Director, Conservation Law Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts

ROBERT A. FROSCH, Vice President, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan

RICHARD GARWIN, Fellow, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, and Adjunct Professor of Physics, Columbia University, New York

JOSEPH GLAS, Director, Vice President, and General Manager, Fluorochemicals Division, E.I. du Pont, Wilmington, Delaware

KAI N. LEE, Professor and Director, Center for Environmental Studies, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts

GREGG MARLAND, Scientist, Environmental Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

JESSICA TUCHMAN MATHEWS, Vice President, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.

ARTHUR H. ROSENFELD, Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, and Director, Center for Building Science, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California

EDWARD S. RUBIN, Professor, Mechanical Engineering and Public Policy, and Director, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

MILTON RUSSELL, Professor of Economics and Senior Fellow, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Collaborating Scientist, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

STEPHEN H. SCHNEIDER, Head, Interdisciplinary Climate Systems, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

EUGENE B. SKOLNIKOFF, Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

THOMAS H. STIX, Professor, Department of Astrophysics and Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

EDITH BROWN WEISS, Professor of Law, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (resigned from panel October 1990)

GEORGE F. CARRIER (Chairman), T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

WILFRIED BRUTSAERT, Professor of Hydrology, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

ROBERT D. CESS, Leading Professor, State University of New York, Stony Brook

HERMAN CHERNOFF, Professor of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

ROBERT E. DICKINSON, Professor, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson

JOHN IMBRIE, H.L. Doherty Professor of Oceanography, Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

THOMAS B. KARL, Meteorologist, Climate Research and Applications, National Climate Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

MICHAEL C. MacCRACKEN, Physicist and Division Leader, Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, Livermore

BERRIEN MOORE, Professor and Director, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham

Staff
ROB COPPOCK, Staff Director
DEBORAH D. STINE, Staff Officer
NANCY A. CROWELL, Administrative Specialist
MARION R. ROBERTS, Administrative Secretary

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Papers of special interest to Chemtrail Investigators

Jay Michaelson 1998 Geoengineering: A climate change Manhattan Project - Stanford Environmental Law Journal January - www.metatronics.net/lit/geo2.html

Edward Teller (director emeritus, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), "The Planet Needs a Sunscreen" Wall Street Journal, October 17, 1997. - www.ncpa.org/pi/enviro/envpd/pdenv125.html

Climate Change 2001: Working Group III: Mitigation - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/index.htm

Ramanathan, V. 1988. The greenhouse theory of climate change: A test by an inadvertent experiment. Science 243:293­299 www.gfdl.gov/~gth/netscape/authors/ramaswamy.html

Schimel, D., D. Alves, I. Enting, M. Heimann, F. Joos, D. Raynaud, T., Wigley, M. Prather, R. Derwent, D. Ehhalt, P. Fraser, E. Sanheuza, X., Zhou, P. Jonas, R. Charlson, H. Rodhe, S., Sadasivan, K. P. Shine, Y. Fouquart, V. Ramaswamy, S. Solomon, J., Srinivasan, D. Albritton, I. Isaksen, M. Lal, and D. Wuebbles, 1996: Radiative forcing of climate change. In Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69-131. www.gfdl.gov/~gth/netscape/authors/ramaswamy.html

Ramaswamy, V., R. J. Charlson, J. A. Coakley, J. L. Gras, Harshvardhan, G. Kukla, M. P. McCormick, D. Moller, E. Roeckner, L. L. Stowe, and J. Taylor, 1995: Group report: what are the observed and anticipated meteorological and climatic responses to aerosol forcing? In Aerosol Forcing of Climate, Vol. 20. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 386-399.
www.gfdl.gov/~gth/netscape/authors/ramaswamy.html

Ramaswamy, V., 1988: Aerosol radiative forcing and model responses. In Aerosols and Climate, A. Deepak Publishing, 349-372
www.gfdl.gov/~gth/netscape/authors/ramaswamy.htm

Ramaswamy, V., and J. T. Kiehl. 1985. Sensitivities of the radiative forcing due to large loadings of smoke and dust aerosols. Journal of Geophysical Research 90(D3):5597­5613. www.gfdl.gov/~gth/netscape/authors/ramaswamy.html

Reck, R. A. 1984. Climatic Impact of Jet Engine Distribution of Alumina (Al2O3): Theoretical Evidence for Moderation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Effects. Report GMR-4740. Warren, Mich.: General Motors Research Laboratories, and paper presented to the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Calif., December 1984.

Hunten, D. M. 1975. Residence times of aerosols and gases in the stratosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 2(1):26­27.

Mueller, A. C., and D. J. Kessler. 1985. The effects of particulates from solid rocket motors fired in space. Advances in Space Research 5(2):77­86.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

For anyone out there who is in the mode of "where is the evidence? There is no proof ETC. all you need to do is know a little bit of the history of these kind of projects. There really is no excuse now to deny the possibility of Chemtrails. Not only are chemtrails "possible", but given the evidence here of past operations, it would be more like "probable", even without looking up and noticing...you can see from past actions that the Chemtrail operation fits right in line with a long history of similar operations!

Any debunkers from here on in: if you are going to "comment" please explain the information in the above two articles which are historical record, and prove without a doubt that this kind of operation is not "paranoia" but cold hard fact.


Chemtrails: Delivery System For Dept. of Defense's Toxic Cocktails
By Amy Worthington

To ignore chemtrails is to pretend that the DOD would never test its chemical and biological weapons on unsuspecting people. Most people living on earth want only life, liberty, peace and the pursuit of happiness.

In grisly contrast, America's military-industrial complex harbors an introverted and pathological fixation with war games and death technology. In its inexorable quest for absolute power -- that evolutionary state of decay warned about by President Eisenhower so many years ago -- the complex has unleashed a terrifying array of secretive and dangerous experiments. These include weather modification, earthquake induction and numerous chemical-biological tests on unwitting subjects.

Every aspect of our physical environment is now being manipulated for war games. Discolored skies are continuously polluted by jets spraying chemical aerosols. Bizarre and unpredictable weather is often military-made. Electromagnetic abnormalities -- including artificial lightning -- are generated by HAARP-like installations in sundry places. People are becoming increasingly ill and immuno-compromised from such ecological tampering.

In an expose on Henry Kissinger's momentous war crimes, author Christopher Hitchens writes in Harper's magazine that during the Vietnam War, a U.S. helicopter unit posted the slogan, "Death is our business and business is good." This arrogant paradigm is perfect for the grotesque network of over 100 laboratories on campuses and industrial parks across the nation where military and contract personnel develop new technologies and strategies for killing human beings in the name of national security.

From the military's own abstract of a workshop on "Chemical Lethality Predictions" we learn that when planes spray deadly chemicals in the form of rain or mist, it is possible to calculate how much of those killer agents can be deposited on each person on the ground. The calculations are so precise that "...ten large VX drops that fall over a populated area have the chance to kill up to 9 out of 10 people."

What business has the military to be spraying "populated areas" with lethal toxins?

This is not defense at all. This is genocide.

Many Americans have reported seeing or feeling chemical mists fall from the sky during chemtrail spray episodes. Chemtrail investigator Will Thomas reports that people hit by these mists usually become gravely ill within 48 hours.

Thomas tells of hiker Joe Burton in Tennessee who, in 1998, was sprayed by a plane leaving a heavy toxic fog at tree-top level. Burton contracted symptoms similar to Gulf War Illness. Strange chemicals had entered his lungs, attacking his liver, gallbladder and kidneys. He was also found to have a very rare flu-like virus that was tracked to Geneva, Switzerland, home of the World Health Organization.

Congressional hearings of 1975, 1977 and 1994 confirm in nauseating detail that our illustrious Department of Defense has used the American population as hapless guinea pigs since WWII. Rutgers professor Leonard Cole collected from US military records a horrifying list of biological and chemical agents furtively tested on American and Canadian civilian populations.

In 1999, Jonathan Moreno of Clinton's Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, also confirmed in his book Undue Risk decades of murderous military-intelligence experimentation on civilians without their knowledge or consent.

In 1953, an odious series of 36 tests was conducted on citizens of Winnipeg in Canada. Our government lied to the Winnipeg mayor, assuring him that the tests were nontoxic and defense-necessary. The actual purpose of these CIA-designed tests was to see how large a percentage of the population could be given chemical-induced cancer.

Our spray planes and spray trucks saturated the people of Winnipeg with the carcinogen zinc cadmium sulfide, the same chemical sprayed on many American cities. By calculating the number of people who subsequently came into medical clinics complaining of sore throats, bronchial problems and ringing ears, the test-masters determined that had the chemical not been watered down, they could have induced cancer in one-third of the Winnipeg population.

In 1994, Dr. Cole testified before a Senate committee that he feared the military might develop new and genetically engineered pathogens. He could not have known then that our government had been working on such heinous pathogens since the 1960s, when it initiated a special virus cancer program in order to create contagious cancers for biowarfare.

By 1996, Dr. Leonard Horowitz confirmed in his book Emerging Viruses that both AIDS and the Marburg-Ebola complex were man-made monstrosities hatched out of America's biowarfare labs.

Still today the military continues with open air testing in populated areas across the United States, using dangerous live simulants to test biowarfare detection gadgets.

These open-air tests involve the spraying of dangerous germs from backpack canisters and vehicles. Because these germs can cause everything from meningitis to heart disease, the personnel who conduct the tests are always protected with gas masks and body suits. People in the communities being sprayed are given no protection at all.

Captain Joyce Riley stood before a group of government officials last year in Louisiana where the military was determined to conduct open air germ tests, against the vociferous will of the people. She boldly told them that the only acts of terrorism ever conducted on American soil have been perpetrated by our own government. Never were truer words spoken!

Our government's hypocritical warnings about domestic terrorism are ludicrous since a criminal element of the Clinton administration masterminded the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City.

Former Oklahoma Congressman Charles Key and his fact-finding committee have documented the federal government's prior knowledge of the bombing, its complicity in wiring columns inside the building with explosives and its heinous cover-up of the facts. The Oklahoma bombing, which killed 180 people including children in daycare, qualifies the federal government's itself as a premier terrorist organization.

Meantime, US officials deliberately exaggerate the threat of terrorism from Third World malcontents. Even the General Accounting Office admits foreign terrorists would not likely use bio-weapons because they would have to overcome "significant technical and operational challenges."

Yet, as the mainstream media reported two years ago, the terrorist racket is a huge growth industry for hungry corporations that interface with the Department of Defense and lust for $10 billion set aside for terrorism prevention.

In 1994, after Dr. Cole testified before the Senate, the Rockefeller Committee issued a report confirming 50 years of secret government testing on both civilians and military personnel. Perversely -- while all of this lip service was going on -- the military was simultaneously conducting a series of hideous biological warfare tests on the people of Oakville, Washington.

During the summer of 1994, US military aircraft began dropping a gel substance on the tiny town of Oakville near the Pacific coast. Everybody in town came down with flu and pneumonia-like symptoms. Some people were hospitalized and remained ill for months. Pets and barnyard animals died.

The police chief was patrolling the town one morning at 3 a.m. when a deluge of sticky stuff coated the windshield of his patrol car. He cleaned the goo with rubber gloves but just breathing it made him deathly ill. By afternoon he had major trouble breathing.

The gel material was tested by a number of government and private labs which found human blood cells and nasty bacteria, including a modified version of pseudonomas fluorescens, cited in over 160 military papers as an experimental biowarfare bacteria.

Unsolved Mysteries aired the story on national television in May, 1997. Several Oakville citizens reported bizarre encounters with FEMA officials and intelligence personnel from Fort Hood Texas -- home of the Black Hawk unit. These spooks made repeated visits to Oakville, probing people about their health and reportedly intimidating those who had been interviewed on television.

Also in 1997, rancher William Wallace was plowing his fields near Kettle Falls Washington when a US Navy Intruder swooped down and sprayed him with a fine mist. He became so deathly sick he could not lift his arm above his head for days. He lost his job because of his illness. His cat's face became paralyzed and actually began to dissolve until it died.

Wallace went to the CBS affiliate in Spokane with his story. Two days later, a turbo prop aircraft dived over his house spraying something that made him and his family ill again. Wallace told chemtrail investigator Will Thomas he felt this was a warning to "shut up." The CBS affiliate in Spokane finally did a two-part news interview with Wallace in the spring of 1999.

Again in 1997, in Southern Idaho near the town of Caldwell, seven healthy people died in their sleep when their lungs collapsed. All were in perfect health.

An article in the Arizona Republic noted that people had suspicions that officials might be covering something up. Two years later an eyewitness report was filed about a dark fibrous material falling on Caldwell homes, cars and lawns shortly before the mysterious deaths occurred. Residents said the material looked like feces.

Medical journalist Ermina Cassani has investigated nationwide reports of such biological waste being dropped on neighborhoods from low-flying planes. Cassani investigated over 30 different yuk drops during the years 1998 and 1999.

In 1998, she obtained a sample that looked like dried blood from a Michigan house. Examining this material, a University of Michigan lab found pseudonomas fluorescens, the same bug used on Oakville. It can cause horrible human infections including fatal shock, and because of its glowing properties, it allows the military to track its path.

There were also other ugly pathogens, including staph and several fungi which can cause lung disease. Consider the high fungi content of this sample in the context of the mysterious fungus that infected Kentucky horses last spring. Could not furtive aerial drops provide a convenient mode of economic sabotage?

Cassani also reported 29 biological "drops" in the state of Utah. HAZMAT teams in biochemical hazard gear cleaned up the feces with chlorine. Utah is home to the infamous Dugway Proving Grounds, a chemical-biological test center where hundreds of former workers have contracted Gulf-War like symptoms, according to a 1997 testimony before a government committee.

During numerous chemtrail spray episodes, the small town of Sallisaw in Eastern Oklahoma area was saturated with a web-like material in which lab techs discovered an unusually large enterobacteria. The critter was a mutant of E. coli, salmonella and anthrax; undoubtedly one of the military's designer bugs. Sallisaw resident Patrick Edgar has reported on the internet that the entire town was made extremely ill by the spraying and that the town now has epidemic rates of both lupus and cancer.

Biological weapons encapsulated in protective coatings like synthetic webbing would explain why so many people who see web-like filaments drifting down from the skies report illness after touching the webs. When the webbing is closely examined, it is proven to be man-made filaments of the type developed by both industrial and military entities.

Last year, South Africans reported web-like filaments falling from aircraft that formed a blanket-like appearance across vegetation, telephone poles and fences. When the cattle ate it they developed large bumps on their hides, became listless and went blind. Informed people everywhere are now wary of "web looking" materials.

This year, using both electrostatic precipitation devices and HEPA air filters to collect outdoor atmospheric samples, chemtrail researcher Clifford Carnicom and his associates have documented desiccated blood cells floating in the atmosphere in both New Mexico and Colorado.

With so many atmospheric samples containing biological components, Carnicom has concluded that "crimes of the highest order are being perpetrated against citizens without their knowledge or consent."

Who besides the Department of Defense would have the money and inclination to keep our atmosphere besmirched with such biological materials?

There is much accumulated evidence that gels, webs, fecal matter, powders and blood cells may be used to harbor viruses, mycoplasma and/or other bio-engineered toxins until they can reach their intended hosts. No big surprise. Anything is possible from a military-industrial complex which has ruthlessly unleashed ebola and AIDS upon the world.

For more information on the biological aspects of the ongoing chemtrail project see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Dude, you are an idiot. You're the guy that will end up being a Darwin Award winner one day. Go play with your Legos and let mommy have her computer back!
 

it is all planned out

The following excerpts detail the preferred geoengineering Mitigations for reducing greenhouse gasses, global warming and radiation from space. Quoted from: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming



Evaluating Geoengineering Options
"Several geoengineering options appear to have considerable potential for offsetting global warming and are much less expensive than other options being considered. Because these options have the potential to affect the radiative forcing of the planet, because some of them cause or alter a variety of chemical reactions in the atmosphere, and because the climate system is poorly understood, such options must be considered extremely carefully. These options might be needed if greenhouse warming occurs, climate sensitivity is at the high end of the range considered in this report, and other efforts to restrain greenhouse gas emissions fail."

"The first set of geoengineering options screens incoming solar radiation with dust or soot in orbit about the earth or in the atmosphere. The second set changes cloud abundance by increasing cloud condensation nuclei through carefully controlled emissions of particulate matter."

"The stratospheric particle options should be pursued only under extreme conditions or if additional research and development removes the concern about these problems. The cloud stimulation option should be examined further and could be pursued if concerns about acid rain could be managed through the choice of materials for cloud condensation nuclei or by careful management of the system. The third class increases ocean absorption of CO2 through stimulating growth of biological organisms."

Screening Out Some Sunlight
"Another option for mitigating a global warming would be to try to control the global radiation balance by limiting the amount of incoming radiation from the sun. This could be done by increasing the reflectivity of the earth, i.e., the albedo. Proposals for increasing the whiteness of roofs and surface features would have some effect, but only a fraction of incident solar radiation reaches the earth's surface and a purposeful change in albedo would have more impact if done high in the atmosphere. According to Ramanathan (1988), an increase in planetary albedo of just 0.5 percent is sufficient to halve the effect of a CO2 doubling. Placing a screen in the atmosphere or low earth orbit could take several forms: it could involve changing the quantity or character of cloud cover, it could take the form of a continuous sheet, or it could be divided into many ''mirrors" or a cloud of dust. Preliminary characterizations of some of the possibilities that might be considered are provided below."


Stratospheric Dust
"Although the space dust option does not appear to be sensible, computations of the residence times of 0.2-µm dust above 20 to 40 km are of the order of 1 to 3 years (Hunten, 1975). It seems to be generally accepted that volcanic aerosols remain in the stratosphere for several years (Kellogg and Schneider, 1974; Ramaswamy and Kiehl, 1985). A screen could be created in the stratosphere by adding more dust to the natural stratospheric dust to increase its net reflection of sunlight."

Mass Estimates
"Ramaswamy and Kiehl (1985) estimate that an aerosol dust loading of 0.2 g/m2 for dust with a radius of about 0.26 µm increases the planetary albedo by 12 percent, resulting in a 15 percent decrease of solar flux reaching the surface. Since an approximately 1 percent change in solar flux is required, and their Figures 13 and 15 suggest that, at these loadings, the dust effects may reasonably be extrapolated downward linearly, estimates will be made by using a dust loading of 0.02 g/m2 with a particle radius of 0.26 µm."

"The dust in Ramaswamy and Kiehl's model is distributed between 10 and 30 km in the stratosphere, uniformly over the globe. The actual effect on radiative forcing of a global distribution of additional dust would be somewhat greater at low than at high latitudes because more of the sunlight is effective there for geometric reasons. This would decrease slightly the equator-to-pole temperature gradients and might have some effect on weather intensity. Presumably, this effect can also be studied with global climate models."

Delivery Scenarios
"Aircraft Exhaust Penner et al. (1984) suggested that emissions of 1 percent of the fuel mass of the commercial aviation fleet as particulates, between 40,000- and 100,000-foot (12- to 30-km) altitude for a 10-year period, would change the planetary albedo sufficiently to neutralize the effects of an equivalent doubling of CO2. They proposed that retuning the engine combustion systems to burn rich during the high-altitude portion of commercial flights could be done with negligible efficiency loss. Using Reck's estimates of extinction coefficients for particulates (Reck, 1979a, 1984), they estimated a requirement of about 1.168 ¥ 1010 kg of particulates, compared with the panel's estimate of 1010 kg, based upon Ramaswamy and Kiehl (1985). They then estimated that if 1 percent of the fuel of aircraft flying above 30,000 feet is emitted as soot, over a 10-year period the required mass of particulate material would be emitted.
However, current commercial aircraft fleets seldom operate above 40,000 feet (12 km), and the lifetimes of particles at the operating altitudes will be much shorter than 10 years."

"An alternate possibility is simply to lease commercial aircraft to carry dust to their maximum flight altitude, where they would distribute it. To make a cost estimate, a simple assumption is made that the same amount of dust assumed above for the stratosphere would work for the tropopause (the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere). The results can be scaled for other amounts. The comments made above about the possible effect of dust on stratospheric ozone apply as well to ozone in the low stratosphere, but not in the troposphere. The altitude of the tropopause varies with latitude and season of the year."

"In 1987, domestic airlines flew 4,339 million ton-miles of freight and express, for a total express and freight operating revenue of $4,904 million (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1988). This gives a cost of slightly more than $1 per ton-mile for freight. If a dust distribution mission requires the equivalent of a 500-mile flight (about 1.5 hours), the delivery cost for dust is $500/t, and ignoring the difference between English and metric tons, a cost of $0.50/kg of dust. If 1010 kg must be delivered each 83 days, (provided dust falls out at the same rate as soot), 5 times more than the 1987 total ton-miles will be required."
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

Clifford Carnicom is clearly an idiot
Kunicich is a moron
You Chem Heads have your heads in the clouds with your stupid non-issue.

SC Indy-Media is a leftist irrelevent outlet that is a fine depository for your nonsense. Notice that SCIM is the only IM that subscribes to this nonsense. Folks elsewhere have better issues to go on ... as one person on Craigs List said:
"my BS Detector has just gone off"
forums.craigslist.org/

Grow up.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

considering you think that santa cruz indymedia is a leftist irrelevant outlet, you sure spend allot of time on it, what's up with that?

YOU must be a total idiot to spend time on this site so much as you do, considering how you feel about this site. Are you brain dead? Or do you just work for the fed? Your stupid tone has shown up all over this site. Only morons spend lots of time on sites that they dispise!

You also mentioned that this is the only indy media site with Chemtrail information on it (as if that proves anything)!

All it proves is that you are obviously a total idiot or you work for the fed cause there are allot of indy media sites out there, and for you to know that none of them have chemtrail info on them means you spend allot of time researching it. Why would you do that? You wouldn't have an agenda would you right wing ass hole????


duh
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

It is monday. The sky over Santa Cruz is covered with dispersed chemtrails from earlier today (which were seen and photographed).

Meanwhile, Santa Cruzans go on with their life, totally unaware of what is being done to their skies. It is really a sad situation.
 

Re: CHEMTRAILS911.COM

>>"Chickiedeb is paid by the fed to confuse you."<<

Almost a year later and I'm still waiting to see those checks that should have started coming in 1999, according to chemmies, anyways. Can't help but wonder how many of the above *posters* still *believe*?? LOL
 

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Views

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Account Login

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software